지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술대회자료
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2018.10
- 수록면
- 31 - 37 (7page)
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
It is pointed out that the possibility of peaceful coexistence in East Asia in the 21st century is likely to be determined in the ocean. There is even a prediction that if a war breaks out, it will be due to a maritime dispute. Therefore, the Chinese academic community tries to secure its historical basis in order to gain an advantage in international maritime disputes. One of the hallmarks of Chinese academia is the study of maritime boundary to achieve this patriotic national goal.
In general, the causes of the Northeast Asian Sea Crisis are explained by various factors such as the historical background between China and neighboring countries, the vigilance of neighboring countries due to the rise of China, and the clashes caused by the US rebalancing strategy in Asia and the Pacific. Although China is still the main objective of maritime traffic protection, it will try to broaden the scope of activities to secure marine energy and develop marine resources in the future, and this will soon increase the possibility of disputes in the marine environment. Therefore, it is very likely that the maritime boundary research to secure advantageous position on the maritime territorial dispute will increase explosively in the future.
The historical narrative of the maritime boundary conflict in the East China Sea and the South China Sea shows a typical teleological view of history. Therefore, it seems difficult to resolve the current maritime territorial dispute without a fundamental shift in the historical perception. Perhaps the maritime boundary conflict is a controversial issue that has brought about the change of history into the modern frontiers of the nation-state, and this may be an anachronistic recognition of the idea of the border, the product of the modern nation-state.
In general, the causes of the Northeast Asian Sea Crisis are explained by various factors such as the historical background between China and neighboring countries, the vigilance of neighboring countries due to the rise of China, and the clashes caused by the US rebalancing strategy in Asia and the Pacific. Although China is still the main objective of maritime traffic protection, it will try to broaden the scope of activities to secure marine energy and develop marine resources in the future, and this will soon increase the possibility of disputes in the marine environment. Therefore, it is very likely that the maritime boundary research to secure advantageous position on the maritime territorial dispute will increase explosively in the future.
The historical narrative of the maritime boundary conflict in the East China Sea and the South China Sea shows a typical teleological view of history. Therefore, it seems difficult to resolve the current maritime territorial dispute without a fundamental shift in the historical perception. Perhaps the maritime boundary conflict is a controversial issue that has brought about the change of history into the modern frontiers of the nation-state, and this may be an anachronistic recognition of the idea of the border, the product of the modern nation-state.
목차
1. 해강(海疆)의 유래
2. 해강을 둘러싼 분쟁
3. 해권(海權)과 해강
4. 나가며
Abstract
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
The Maritime Disputes in Asia : Why the Rule of Law Should Apply
Global Asia
2015 .12
-
남중국해 영토분쟁과 국제법
한양법학
2024 .08
-
Time to Worry, Mate? The Construction of Maritime Security Perceptions Down Under
Pacific Focus
2017 .01
-
중국의 해양정책 언론보도 프레임 분석
한국동북아논총
2023 .09
-
后冷战时代日本海洋安全战略的演变和中国
중국학논총
2022 .06
-
중국 지방정부 간 해상경계 설정에 관한 법적 고찰
해사법연구
2022 .11
-
China’s Maritime StrategyⅠ: The process of institutional change in maritime policies
IFANS FOCUS
2017 .06
-
해양안전 확보를 위한 해사안전법의 최신동향 및 입법적 과제
해사법연구
2022 .07
-
Standardization of Maritime English Curriculum and Assessment to Improve Sea Safety
해양비즈니스
2015 .01
-
일본의 중국과 러시아에 대한 해양영토분쟁의 사례연구
국제정치연구
2017 .12
-
中国海上执法主体法律问题研究
법학연구
2018 .01
-
China's Legal Governance Approaches toward Safeguarding Its Maritime Rights and Interests
Pacific Focus
2024 .08
-
China’s Position on the Territorial Sea Regime in Terms of the South China Sea Disputes: Straight Baselines and Innocent Passage of Warships around Disputed Islands
The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis
2018 .01
-
냉전기 太平洋지역 美·蘇간 해군력 경쟁 : 해양지정학의 인식 변화를 중심으로
군사
2017 .09
-
남중국해 영토⋅해양분쟁의 현황과 법적 과제 - 중국의 ‘일대일로’와의 관련성을 고려하며 -
외법논집
2019 .01
-
The Latest Developments of the US Freedom of Navigation Programs in the South China Sea: Deregulation or Re-balance?
JOURNAL OF EAST ASIA AND INTERNATIONAL LAW
2016 .05
-
중국의 공세적 남중국해 정책 : 시진핑의 해양사상을 중심으로
국제정치연구
2019 .03
-
Continuing to Confront China : Trump’s Approach to Maritime Security in East Asia
Global Asia
2017 .12
-
한국 해양사 연구의 성과와 역사수업에서의 교재화 방안
사회과교육
2015 .09
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0