지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Global trade protectionism has increased further and U.S. priorities and protectionism have strengthened since Trump took office in 2017. Trump administration is actively implementing tariff measures based on U.S. domestic trade laws rather than the WTO rules and regulations. In particular, the American government has recently been imposing high tariffs due to national security and imposing economic sanctions on other countries" imports. According to the U.S. Trade Expansion Act Section 232, the American government imposed additional tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to WTO member countries such as China, India, and EU etc. on march 15, 2018. Thus, this study aims to investigate whether the U.S. Trade Expansion Act Section 232 is consistent with GATT/WTO rules by comparing the legal basis of US / China / WTO regulations related to Section 232 of the U.S. Trade Expansion Act, and gives some suggestions for responding to the Section 232 measure. As the Section 232 measure exceeded the scope of GATT’ s Security Exceptions regulation and is very likely to be understood as a safeguard measure. If so, the American government is deemed to be in breach of WTO’ s regulations, such as the most-favored-nation treatment obligations and the duty reduction obligations. In addition, American government is deemed to be failed to meet the conditions of initiation of safeguard measure and violated the procedural requirements such as notification and consultation. In order to respond to these U.S. protection trade measures, all affected countries should actively use the WTO multilateral system to prevent unfair measures. Also, it is necessary to revise the standard jurisdiction of the dispute settlement body and to explore the balance of the WTO Exception clause so that it can be applied strictly. Finally, it would be necessary for Chinese exporters to take a counter-strategy under such trade pressure.
목차
Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 제232조 조치의 법적요건 및 조사 분석
Ⅲ. 철강 및 알루미늄 수입에 관한 제232조 관세조치
Ⅳ. 법적 타당성 검토
Ⅴ. 결론
References
참고문헌 (26)
참고문헌 신청
Bureau of Industry and Security / Section 232 Investigations: The Effect of Imports on the National Security
Li, W. / 2015 / The Application of WTO Security Exception Clause under the New Security Situation / Journal of CUPL 6
Li, J. / 2018 / U.S. 232 Survey and China's Response / People Rule of Law 10:3
Lester, S. / The Drafting History of GATT Article XXI: The U.S. View of the Scope of the Security Exception
Lee, Cheon-Gi / 2018 / Protectionism from the United States and WTO Rules : Section 232 of the United States trade expansion act :1~11
Li, W. / 2015 / The Application of WTO Security Exception Clause under the New Security Situation / Journal of CUPL 6
Li, J. / 2018 / U.S. 232 Survey and China's Response / People Rule of Law 10:3
Lester, S. / The Drafting History of GATT Article XXI: The U.S. View of the Scope of the Security Exception
Lee, Cheon-Gi / 2018 / Protectionism from the United States and WTO Rules : Section 232 of the United States trade expansion act :1~11
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
미중 무역전쟁 연구 : 트럼프정부의 보호무역정책 요인분석을 중심으로
김관옥
국제정치연구
2018
.06
국제통상법적 관점에서 미국의 일방적 대중(對中)통상압력에 대한 연구 : WTO 부속서 2 분쟁해결규칙 및 절차에 관한 양해를 중심으로
박정준
통상정보연구
2019
.03
국가 안보 위협 논란에 따른 미국의 1962년 무역확장법 232조 수입조치에 대한 통상법적 쟁점
유지영
통상법률
2017
.12
미국의 우회덤핑과 원산지 규정의 운용에 관한 연구
홍재성
,
송진구
관세학회지
2021
.08
미국의 불공정 무역 제한 제도에 관한 연구
임목삼
무역상무연구
2021
.08
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-324-000483710