메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술대회자료
저자정보
Ulusoy, B. (Atılım University) Griffin, L.D. (University College London) Mylonas, D. (University College London)
저널정보
한국색채학회 AIC 2017 Jeju 2017 AIC CONGRESS
발행연도
2017.10
수록면
24 - 27 (4page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
We explored Turkish colour naming using an Internet-based colour naming experiment to: a) collect colour names in wide cultural use with their corresponding colour ranges and response times, b) to estimate colour coordinates of centroids of 11 Turkish basic colour terms (BCTs) and to compare them to the 11 English BCTs estimated using the same web-experiment, and c) to establish the English equivalents of the most common Turkish colour names (n>11) based on the distribution of their colour coordinates. Turkish colour names were mostly monolexemic (61%) and 39% of responses were BCTs. The most frequent responses were the BCTs mor (eq. purple), pembe (eq. pink), mavi (eq. blue), yeşil (eq. green) and sarı (eq. yellow) followed by the non-basic turkuaz (eq. turquoise) and lila (eq. lilac). Response time analysis showed that participants responded quicker to sarı, mor, beyaz (eq. white) and siyah (eq. black) than to other terms. Turkish speakers reached consensus (dominance > 50%) for 25 colour names; sarı had the most samples named with consensus followed by mor, bordo (eq. burgundy) and lacivet (eq. navy blue). The comparison between centroids of Turkish and English eleven BCTs showed a very good agreement (CIEDE2000 distances: mean separation=2.5, standard deviation=1.5).

목차

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
REFERENCES

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-651-000499796