인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
This paper reviews the overall ‘Chromite Operation’ plan based on the MacArthur Memorial Collection documents and compares the details of the four operational plans. We will also look into the relevance of the contingency plan SL-17, which was prepared just before the war that some researchers had suggested, to develop in early July, LD-SL-17.
In general, when discussing the operation plan of the Inchon Landing Operation, the Chromite Operation Plan, there are three operational plans listed as 100-B, 100-C and 100-D. And these operation plans have been understood as different landing areas - Incheon, Gunsan, and Jumunjin – respectively. However, if you analyze the plan carefully, this is a misinterpretation. In other words, each operation plan is based on the Incheon Landing Operation, and if the US 8th Army does not break the front line of the North Korean Army on the Nakdong River Front, it will undertake an additional landing operation.
LD-SL-17(Logistic Study Covering Operations in Korea, LD-SL-17) prepared by the US Army Chief of Staff (G-4), which has been known to be the basis of the Chromite Operation Plan, 17). The plan was revised in July, early in the war. But as we have seen, it is unlikely that this plan is directly linked to the Chromite operation plan. The detailed operational plan does not fit. Therefore, it is unreasonable to claim that the pre-war Far East forces in Korea already predicted and prepared for the outbreak of war.
In addition, we can confirm that each project has an organic relation that the meaning of the four chromite operation plans are optional. In other words, 100-A has a meaning as a fake attack plan of the 100-B plan, and it was an operation that could also be used as a real plan in case of emergency. The 100-C plan and the 100-D plan were complementary plans of the 100-B plan. In other words, the Incheon Landing Operation Plan will proceed as planned, assuming the US 8th Army, which can not break the North Korean Front along the Nakdong River, and as a complementary measure, the 100- And the 100-D plan was to annihilate the North Korean forces in South Korea through further landing in the Gangneung- Jumunjin area.
In general, when discussing the operation plan of the Inchon Landing Operation, the Chromite Operation Plan, there are three operational plans listed as 100-B, 100-C and 100-D. And these operation plans have been understood as different landing areas - Incheon, Gunsan, and Jumunjin – respectively. However, if you analyze the plan carefully, this is a misinterpretation. In other words, each operation plan is based on the Incheon Landing Operation, and if the US 8th Army does not break the front line of the North Korean Army on the Nakdong River Front, it will undertake an additional landing operation.
LD-SL-17(Logistic Study Covering Operations in Korea, LD-SL-17) prepared by the US Army Chief of Staff (G-4), which has been known to be the basis of the Chromite Operation Plan, 17). The plan was revised in July, early in the war. But as we have seen, it is unlikely that this plan is directly linked to the Chromite operation plan. The detailed operational plan does not fit. Therefore, it is unreasonable to claim that the pre-war Far East forces in Korea already predicted and prepared for the outbreak of war.
In addition, we can confirm that each project has an organic relation that the meaning of the four chromite operation plans are optional. In other words, 100-A has a meaning as a fake attack plan of the 100-B plan, and it was an operation that could also be used as a real plan in case of emergency. The 100-C plan and the 100-D plan were complementary plans of the 100-B plan. In other words, the Incheon Landing Operation Plan will proceed as planned, assuming the US 8th Army, which can not break the North Korean Front along the Nakdong River, and as a complementary measure, the 100- And the 100-D plan was to annihilate the North Korean forces in South Korea through further landing in the Gangneung- Jumunjin area.
#인천상륙작전
#크로마이트 작전
#군수연구 LD-SL-17
#맥아더
#라이트
#극동군사령부
#합동전략기획단
#Inchon Landing Operation
#Chromite Operation
#Logistic Study Covering Operations in Korea(LD-SL-17)
#Douglas MacArthur
#Edwin K. Wright
#Far East Command
#Joint Strategic Planning and Operations Group
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- 1. 서론
- 2. 인천상륙작전의 예비계획과 작전 준비과정
- 3. 군수참모부 작전 계획(LD-SL-17)과 크로마이트 계획과의 연관성
- 4. 크로마이트 작전 4가지 계획의 내용과 차이
- 5. 결론
- 참고문헌
- Abstract
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-390-000577560