메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Jin Wang (Sun Yat-Sen University) Keebom Nahm (University of Seoul)
저널정보
서울대학교 사회발전연구소 Journal of Asian Sociology Journal of Asian Sociology Vol.48 No.1
발행연도
2019.3
수록면
91 - 114 (24page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
After decades of rapid economic growth that brought significant improvement of the living standard and expansion of personal freedom, China has not moved closer to democratization as many predicted and anticipated. The conventional wisdom in political sociology that economic development and more individual freedom will spur political liberalization seems not to hold in the case of China. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP)’s abilities to exert stricter social and political control seem to have increased with economic growth and prosperity, not diminished. If anything, Chinese political system seems to be moving further away from becoming a democracy. This paper argues that political institutions are culturally rooted; non-indigenous institutions need to be planted or transplanted to another culture in order to grow. Liberal democracy is an institution deeply rooted in the European cultural tradition that spread to the rest of the world in modern time with the spread of the Western civilization, just as plant and animal species indigenous from one continent spread to other continents with globalization. The wholesale-style westernization movement in China during the Republic era in the first half of the twentieth century was short-lived and its cultural influences on Chinese society were largely erased and overwritten by communism during the first thirty years of the PRC. The CCP has been consistently vigilant not to allow the same Western cultural influences to occur, at least not in the political area, over the past forty years as it implemented the reform and opening policies, and it has been rather successful in this regard. As an alternative, the CCP is increasingly looking to revive the traditional, conservative Confucianism to replace the radical, revolutionary communism as the ideological foundation for the collectivistic statist political system, the diametrical opposite of liberal democracy. It is not so much politically naive, but theoretically wrong to assume that economic liberalization would inevitably lead to political liberalization and democratization.

목차

Introduction
Mandate of heaven and pious-loyalty
The dynastic cycle in Chinese history
The crisis of Confucianism and the rise of communism
The return of Confucianism
Conclusion
References

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-331-000560413