인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
학술저널
Full-text
오류 신고하기해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
논문 기본 정보
- 저자정보
초록·키워드
Business–information technology (IT) alignment, which links IT-based strategies to higher business goals, is becoming more critical as organizations rely more on IT solutions to conduct their business activities. While GQM+Strategies provides a platform to achieve good business–IT alignment, lack of attention to different aspects of an organization may lead to failure to do so. In this paper, we evaluated three cases of GQM+Strategies implementation to find possibilities of integrating balanced scorecard perspectives into the GQM+Strategies framework by classifying the goals and strategies into balanced scorecard perspectives and evaluating them based on rules of the balanced scorecard framework. We found that GQM+Strategies has a problem in maintaining balanced distribution of goals and strategies across different perspectives. We also saw signs that inexperienced grid developers may align the goals and strategies poorly when classifying the goals and strategies into perspectives. Lastly, we found that transitions between different balanced scorecard perspectives happen exclusively at the derivation of goals from strategies. Based on those findings, we propose three potential methods to improve GQM+Strategies in order to detect potential problems. On top of that, we explain what is needed for each method before we finally utilize them.
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.