메뉴 건너뛰기
소속 기관 / 학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
고객센터 ENG
주제분류

논문 기본 정보

저자정보
(경북대학교)
저널정보
언어과학회 언어과학연구 언어과학연구 제88집
오류 신고하기

피인용 0

검색

    초록·키워드

    There are clear syntactic and semantic differences between the nomarker verbal complement clause and zhi-verbal complement clause in ancient Chinese. It is defined by the type of main verb that precedes it. Complement-taking verbs fall into three major classes: modality verbs, manipulation verbs, and perception-cognition-utterance verbs. Modality verbs and manipulation verbs precede no-marker complements and perception-cognition-utterance verbs precede complements marked by zhi (之). These dimensions involve the semantic bond or semantic integration. Temporal contiguity is indeed a necessary precondition for two events to become, cognitively, a single complex event, and referential integration is also an important sub-dimension of event integration. Modality verbs and manipulation verbs require temporal contiguity and co-reference. In contrast, p-c-u verbs occupy the bottom of integration scale, and their complements require no temporal contiguity and no co-reference with any argument of the main clause.

    최근 본 자료 전체보기

      UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-700-000789293