메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
Junghyun Kim (Inha Technical College)
저널정보
한국응용언어학회 응용언어학 응용언어학 제35권 제2호
발행연도
2019.6
수록면
83 - 104 (22page)
DOI
10.17154/kjal.2019.6.35.2.83

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study investigated the use of adverbial connectors in Korean college students’ English persuasive essays, compared with that of native speakers. This study also covered comparing the use of adverbial connectors of the current study and that of other studies with different EFL backgrounds. The selection of adverbial connectors used for data analysis was based on 95 connectors from Quirk, Greenbaum, Leech and Svartvik (1985). The study adopted two corpora, KELC (The Korean English Learner Corpus) and LOCNESS (The Louvan Corpus of Native Speaker). Korean learners used 69 types of connectors, whereas native speakers used 80 types of connectors in their essays. However, Korean learners used twice as many adverbial connectors as native speakers. Korean learners excessively overused adverbial connectors such as second, so, and third, but they underused also, then, however, and now. Finally, they used the initial position of the sentences the most, while their native counterparts dominantly used the medial parts of the sentences. Regarding comparing the results with other EFL studies, however, therefore, and for example were common adverbial connectors among all comparing EFL studies. When comparing the top 10 frequent adverbial connectors of the current study, studies from Asian countries had more common adverbial connectors than Western country. Most comparing EFL studies indicated that the sentence initial location of adverbial connectors was more common than the sentence medial whether the writers were EFL learners or native speakers.

목차

Ⅰ. INTRODUCTION
Ⅱ. LITERATURE REVIEW
Ⅲ. METHODOLOGY
Ⅳ. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Ⅴ. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS
REFERENCES

참고문헌 (24)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0

UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-701-000755463