Outcome of minimally-invasive versus open pancreatectomies for solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas: A 2:1 matched case-control study

Hwee Leong Tan; Ek Khoon Tan; Jin Yao Teo; Juinn Huar Kam; Ser Yee Lee; Peng Chung Cheow; Prema Raj Jeyaraj; Pierce K. Chow; Alexander Y. Chung; London L. Ooi; Chung Yip Chan; Brian K. P. Goh

추천

검색

질문

자료유형: 학술저널

저자정보: Hwee Leong Tan (Singapore General Hospital) Ek Khoon Tan (Singapore General Hospital) Jin Yao Teo (Singapore General Hospital) Juinn Huar Kam (Singapore General Hospital) Ser Yee Lee (Singapore General Hospital) Peng Chung Cheow (Singapore General Hospital) Prema Raj Jeyaraj (Singapore General Hospital) Pierce K. Chow (Singapore General Hospital) Alexander Y. Chung (Singapore General Hospital) London L. Ooi (Singapore General Hospital) Chung Yip Chan (Singapore General Hospital) Brian K. P. Goh (Singapore General Hospital)

저널정보: 한국간담췌외과학회 Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 한국간담췌외과학회지 제23권 제3호

발행연도: 2019.8

수록면: 252 - 257 (6page)

이용수

📌

연구주제

📖

연구배경

🔬

연구방법

🏆

연구결과

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기

Backgrounds/Aims: Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPPN) is typically seen in young healthy females who would likely benefit from minimally-invasive pancreatectomy (MIP). A few comparative studies have suggested that MIP is associated with favorable outcomes when compared to the open approach for SPPN. This study aims to mitigate potential selection bias by performing a matched case-control study comparing MIP vs open pancreatectomy (OP) for SPPN. Methods: We performed a single-institution retrospective electronic chart review of all patients who underwent surgery for pathologically confirmed SPPN between 2000 and 2017. A 2:1 matched comparison using age, gender, tumor size and the type of pancreatectomy was performed between OP and MIP. Results: A total of 40 patients with a median age of 40.3 years (range 16.5-64.4) and female sex predominance (n=34, 85.0%) underwent surgery during the study period. Nine patients underwent MIP. Matched comparison between 18 OP and 9 MIP demonstrated that MIP was associated with a longer median operating time (305 vs 180 min, p=0.046) and shorter median postoperative stay (6 vs 9 days, p=0.015). There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion requirements, postoperative morbidity (including postoperative pancreatic fistula) and mortality, resection margins, lymph node yield and long-term survival. Conclusions: MIP is a safe and viable option in the management of SPPN with the benefit of a shorter postoperative length of stay at the expense of a longer operation time. There was no significant difference in oncologic outcomes between both groups of patients.

#Laparoscopic pancreatectomy #Minimally-invasive pancreatectomy #Robotic pancreatectomy #Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

참고문헌이 DBpia에서 서비스 중이라면, [참고문헌 신청]을 통해 등록해보세요

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!