메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국중앙영어영문학회 영어영문학연구 영어영문학연구 제56권 제2호
발행연도
2014.1
수록면
161 - 180 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This essay explores the way that Shakespeare dramatizes an ekphrasis process with the wager between Iachimo and Posthumus in Cymbeline. Recent critics have defined ekphrasis as the verbal representation of visual representation. Many Shakespearean critics increasingly consider Shakespeare’s drama as powerful examples of ekphrasis. In this way, it is possible that ekphrasis should be central to the study of Shakespeare. The wager between Iachimo and Posthumus is a masculine competition for verbal representation and Imogen’s beauty or her body becomes an object for the ekphrasis battle. Thus, the descriptive contest can be seen as an triangle relationship and in Cymbeline, ekphrasis is represented as a strategy by which men describe the female body in order to triumph in a verbal contest with other men. Above all, Iachimo’s description of Imogen and decorations in her bedroom, especially tapestry is one of the best examples of the verbal representation of visual objects in Shakespearean drama. In particular, it is remarkable that Iachimo first calls the hanging in Imogen’s bedchamber an “arras” and then later a “tapestry.” Through the shift in textile terminology, he skillfully dramatizes tapestry ekphrasis. As tapestry is not on the stage but described by Iachimo, Shakespeare requires the audience /reader to see it in the mind’s eye. In bringing pictures to the mind’s eye, ekphrasis can provide images that are not represented on the stage. Eventually, in Cymbleine, Shakespeare’s ekphrasis is presented as a trope that can create a powerful illusion of presence, describing the absent object that we cannot see on the stage.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (26)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0