메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국중앙영어영문학회 영어영문학연구 영어영문학연구 제55권 제2호
발행연도
2013.1
수록면
265 - 282 (18page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This paper deals with semantic structure and argument structure in psychological verbs. They can be defined as verbs describing psychological or mental state of animate beings. Since psychological verbs show the phenomena related to meaning, it is difficult to describe and explain them in terms of syntactic structure. Postal (1971) points out that the structural approach cannot explain the active-passive pairs in psychological verbs. Levin (1993) classifies psychological verbs in regard to argument structure. She presents four types: amuse verbs, admire verbs, marvel verbs, and appeal verbs. Amuse and admire verbs belong to transitive verbs, whereas marvel and appeal verbs intransitive verbs. Croft (1991) suggests causativity relation to explain semantic structure in psychological verbs. He represents amuse verbs as causal chain, and admire verbs as direct causal state. Psychological verbs assign Experiencer and Theme to argument structure. In syntactic realization, Experiencer can appear as subject or object, and also Theme as subject or object. This means that mismatch occurs between argument structure and syntactic structure. In order to handle it, Grimshaw (1990) proposes thematic hierarchy and causal hierarchy. Belletti & Rizzi (1988) explain the mismatch appearing in psychological verbs in Italian. They argue that according to Burzio’s (1986) generalization, Theme can be moved to subject position. Grimshaw and Belletti & Rizzi show that it is adequate to analyze the phenomena occurring in psychological verbs in terms of argument structure based on meaning.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (8)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0