인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
A recent philosophical debate discussed the question if Confucian ethics could still have a function in contemporary world society. Some described Confucian ethics, particularly with respect to its focus on the importance of family relations, as an impediment for true modernization which, in the final end, would only serve as a justification of nepotism and corruption. According to this view, Confucianism allows for giving precedence to the interests of your family or of the group to which you feel you belong in all cases where those are in conflict with general ethical principles. Critics of this position pointed out that Confucius did not explicitly advocate nepotism, and much less corruption, and that he was not opposed to benevolent moral principles that are binding for everyone. The main argument was that Confucian moral values are indeed universally valid, and not only among family members or friends.
Such virtues as humaneness (ren) or righteousness (yi), according to these interpreters, can serve as much as general moral principles as any Western set of basic moral values.
In my view, it is possible to come up with a stronger defence of Confucian morality In my view, Confucian ethics did not aim at defining a specific set of universal moral norms, and is precisely therefore, even though this may seem paradoxical at first, much more practical, flexible, and “universalizable” than most Western moral philosophies. I will try to point out the advantages of a Confucian “negative ethics” over traditional and contemporary Western “fundamentalist ethics.” Confucian “negative ethics” says that human excellence cannot be measured by strict obedience to moral or legal norms. Living an excellent life, for Confucius, encompasses more than only ethical correctness. In this sense, Confucius argues for the limitations of ethics, or for a “negative ethics” that negates certain ethical principles in certain situations, and privileges a behavior that is based on, for instance, the feelings one has towards one’s family members or friends. I think that this is a very recommendable attitude, particular with respect and in opposition to contemporary demands for a global “fundamentalist” set of supposedly “universal” ethical rules.
#세계화 시대
#소극적 윤리
#Negative Ethics)
#근본주의적 윤리
#fundamentalist ethics)
#유교 윤리학
#Confucian ethics)
#공자
#孔子)
#Global World
#Negative Ethics
#fundamentalist ethics
#Confucian ethics
#Confucius
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
