메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
통일연구원 International Journal of Korean Unification Studies International Journal of Korean Unification Studies 제14권 제1호
발행연도
2005.1
수록면
1 - 30 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The United States and Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) both claim equal determination to achieve a peaceful, diplomatic solution to the Korean Peninsula’s nuclear issue, but their strategies have failed to achieve progress toward their avowed goal. Here we focus on Washington’s preferred strategy of “neo-containment.” The Bush Administration, since taking office in 2001, has consistently rejected any engagement of North Korea, diplomatically and commercially. Yet at the same time it has declared its preference for a “diplomatic” solution to the nuclear issue. Achieving a “diplomatic” solution without diplomacy and diplomatic dialogue is impossible. Since the start of his second term, however, President Bush appears to have moderated his rejection of “engagement” by tempering his preference for “containment” with some aspects of engagement. This has yielded a hybrid strategy labeled here as “neo-containment.” All the fundamental elements of containment remain in place, such as restrictions on diplomatic contact and economic sanctions, but some dialogue is permitted “under the umbrella of the Six-Party Talks and for the sole purpose of resolving the nuclear issue.” Bush’s “neo-containment” strategy, however, ignores the fact that even if the Six-Party Talks resume, successful negotiation of a resolution and its implementation will require a strategy of engagement

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0