인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록·키워드
Usually the chapter of administrative planning is placed in the textbook among chapters which explain specific forms of individual administrative actions. Therefore, it seems that administrative planning is one specific form of administrative actions. In reality, according to the court law,administrative planning is not dealt as a specific form of administrative actions. The concept of administrative planning cannot explain common legal effects of individual administrative planning. Legal effects of a administrative planning should be determined with which form of administrative actions the planning is applied to. This essay is written for questioning of whether administrative planning is a specific form of administrative actions. First, I have checked if administrative plannings have their own individualistic legal requirements or legal effects, and it did not have their own specialism. In fact, it is cited that it is regulated individually according to ad hoc applied laws. Based on these evidences, administrative planning is hard to admitted as a specific form of individual administrative actions. It is true that administrative planning is too inclusive and also vague for people to recognize administrative planning as one form of the specific acts of administrative. Therefore, unlike many textbooks, ‘administrative planning’ should not be considered as one of specific forms of administrative actions. Finally, administrative planning should be considered individually as to requirements, proceeds, and legal effects.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
