메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
건국대학교 법학연구소 일감법학 일감법학 제18호
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
3 - 36 (34page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The pledgee or mortgagee may also exercise his pledge or mortgage against money or other things which the pledger or mortgagor is entitled to receive by reason of the loss, damage or public expropriation of the thing pledged or mortgaged. In such case, an attachment must be levied thereon prior to their payment or delivery(Art. 342, 370 of the Korean Civil Act). In this case, the above right which the pledgee or mortgagee has is called as the right of subrogation. Sometimes a debtor transfers his ownership on a secured property to his creditor for the purpose of security instead of establishing a pledge or mortgage, when he loans some money from a creditor. This relation is called as Yangdodambo(security by means of transfer) in Korea. Concerning this type of security arise many problems, because it is not regulated by the existing laws. One of them is whether the Art. of 342 may be analogized to Yangdodambo. Recently one Supreme Court decision(2009Da37106 Decided Nov. 26, 2009) pronounced a positive attitude on this problem. This decision concludes that the person who holds a right to movables transferred for security may also exercise the right of subrogation on the right to claim fire insurance money which the person who establishes a right to movables transferred for security has acquired, futhermore the person who establishes a right to movables transferred for security has the insured interest in concluding a fire insurance contract on the secured property. The purpose of this theses is to commentate this Supreme Court decision. Concerning the legal nature of Yangdodambo, ‘the theory of security right’ and ‘the theory of transferring ownership in trust’ has been debated from long ago. What attitude the judicial precedent of Supreme Court has taken has also been debated. But there is no debate at least in one thing that as far as Yangdodambo on movables our Supreme Court has consistently taken ‘the theory of transferring ownership in trust’. In case that the above attitude of our Supreme Court is taken, only the person who holds a right to property transferred for security externally becomes the owner of the secured property. If so, from a logical point of view, there is difficulty to admit the right of subrogation to that person. The reason is that the right of subrogation may be entitled only to the person who holds a security right, not to the owner. On the other hand, arises another question whether the right to claim accident insurance may become the object of the right of subrogation. If we take a stand point of broad view that the right of subrogation may be admitted when the transformed thing is economically and socially identified as same as the original thing, then the right to claim accident insurance may become the object of the right of subrogation. Furthermore arises the question whether the above conclusion may be analogized to Yangdodambo. The very core of that question is whether the person who establishes a right to property transferred for security has the insured interest in concluding an accident insurance contract on the secured property. If ‘the theory of transferring ownership in trust’ which has been taken by our Supreme Court is carried through to the end, there exists still difficulty to recognize the insured interest to the person who establishes a right to property transferred for security. In short, when ‘the theory of transferring ownership in trust’ such as our Supreme Court has taken is chosen, some theoretical difficulties are attended in admitting the right of subrogation to the person who holds a right to property transferred for security and recognizing the insured interest to that person.
#양도담보 #물상대위 #신탁적 소유권이전설 #담보물권설 #손해보험금청구권 #피보험이익 #Yangdodambo #security by means of transfer) #subrogation #'the theory of transferring ownership in trust' #'the theory of security right' #the right to claim accident insurance #the insured interest

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (31)

참고문헌 신청
上柳克郞 / 1993 / 讓渡擔保と被保險利益 / 商法(保險·海上)判例百選 ジュリスト 別冊 (121) google schola 中馬義直 / 1980 / 所有者としての被保險利益と所有權 / ジュリスト 增刊 N o.4 商法の爭點 2 google schola 內田貴 / 2008 / 民法 Ⅲ [第3版Ⅳ] (債權總論· 擔保物權) / 東京大學出版會 google schola 小野秀誠 / 1994 / 讓渡擔保と保險金請求權 / ジュリスト (1038) google schola 山下友信 / 2005 / 保險法 / 有斐閣 google schola

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0