메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
부산외국어대학교 지중해지역원 지중해지역연구 지중해지역연구 제13권 제1호
발행연도
2011.1
수록면
31 - 60 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The aim of this paper is to find out the main factors behind different reform strategies chosen by Spain and Italy, though they tackled similar challenges such as financial imbalances of social security systems and the EMU and opted for social concertation as a feasible policymaking mechanism. Unlike mainstream arguments on concerted welfare reforms, this paper suggests that the different policy choices in concerted social security reforms in two countries under study have been determined by the different structures of concertation, which have had impact on the actors’ strategies, resulting in different policy choices. Differently from Italian case social concertation in Spain has been characterised by the narrow, separate dealing of policy issues. This structure was due to social partners’ strategic choices and political reasons on the government’s part. This issue-separated concertation structure meant the limits on the opportunity for the exchange of resource among actors, which resulted in the path-dependent policy choices. In Italian case, the Amato government and his successors formed a comprehensive reform package, linking issues in incomes policy, collective bargaining structure reform, employment and welfare policy,and tax reform. Through this extensive reform package Italian governments could concede resources to the trade unions in exchange for labour consensus for structural social security reforms.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (28)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0