지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Medical act is not defined coherently in the Korean law, but we can define it as “prevention or treatment of disease based on medical experience or skill”. Medical act can be justified through the explanation of doctor and consent of patient. Current Medical act does not regulate doctor’s duty of explanation for patient’s consent, while Emergency Medical Service Act does it.
The imbalance of information between doctor as medical specialist and patient is inevitable. In the past, patient was the objective of medical act, “venerated doc”’s dispensation. But now he/she is regarded as the subject of medical act, and patient as an consumer of medical service. Therefore he/she comes to have an insatiable appetite for the medical information, but doctor dos not acknowledge the reality according to the rise of patient’s such appetite for information.
Doctor recognizes the change of the relation between patient and doctor, but he/she regards the establishment of new provision about doctor’s liability for explanation as the expansion of punishment or sanction against for himself/herself. Therefore he/she want to escape the legislation of the liability for explanation in Medical Act.
In short, the liability for explanation of doctor should be expanded as the situation outside of the medical act, and regulated in Medical Act.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (0)
참고문헌 신청이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0