지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
Restoring transitional justice would refer to a range of approaches to address human rights violations of the past, to repair fractured justice system, to mourn and memorialize historical wounds, and to make legal compensation to the victims. At times of political transition, transitional justice would provide opportunities for the societies to address past human rights abuses, mass atrocities, or other forms of trauma in order to facilitate a smooth transition into more peaceful future. In case of Korean society the list would include i)coercive migration policies, military draft, and comfort women during Japanese occupation, ii)Jeju April 3 Massacre of post colonial period, iii) civilian massacres and rapes including Nogunri Massarcre during Korean War, and iv) fabricated espionage charges, tortures, suspicious deaths, and civil massacres under military dictatorship.
In political aspect, memory is the very process of power dispute between the official memory and the suppressed memories, where the suppressed past would fight to be recognized as history by banding together with other oppressed memories to form collective memory. The politics of memory focus at micro-power relations between various political interests that get involved into the making process of collective memory and transitional justice. Critical assertion that this article is trying to make regarding legal discourse of truth and reconciliation is that, such power relations may be perceived not only at the level of suppressing counter memories, but also at the very process of restoring and normalizing those suppressed voices, of adapting them into official history.
Thus this article starts with the deconstruction of the notion of restorative justice, through critical analysis on the intentional blurring between absence and loss, which underlies the presumption that we may recover justice of the past and represent existent wounds. Moreover it tries to illustrate how the project of legal compensation leads to normalization, exclusive inclusion, and commodification of counter memories. By doing so, ideological strategy of nation state behind legal discourse of truth and reconciliation may be revealed.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (48)
참고문헌 신청
/ 2004 / The Encyclopedia of Genocide and Crimes against Humanity / Macmillan Reference USA
Anderson,B / 2004 / 상상의 공동체(Imagined Communities) / 나남
Assmann,A / 1999 / 기억의 공간(Erinnerungsraume) / 경북대학교 출판부
Assmann,J / 1995 / Collective Memory and Cultural Identity / New German Critique (65)
Bernstein, R. / / The Culture of Memory / History and Theory 43 (4)
Anderson,B / 2004 / 상상의 공동체(Imagined Communities) / 나남
Assmann,A / 1999 / 기억의 공간(Erinnerungsraume) / 경북대학교 출판부
Assmann,J / 1995 / Collective Memory and Cultural Identity / New German Critique (65)
Bernstein, R. / / The Culture of Memory / History and Theory 43 (4)
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0