메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국외국어대학교 법학연구소 외법논집 외법논집 제35권 제2호
발행연도
2011.1
수록면
139 - 163 (25page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The classical theory of the law of contract has been developed under the principle of liberty of contract on the basis of free will of the parties involved in the contract. But, growth of industry and monetary in contemporary society give rise to centralization of capital to specific minor social classes. As a result, discrepancy in social and economical power among individuals have grown wider and wider. Specifically, behemoths and expert groups have occupied a prominent position at the expense of powerless consumers in the real contract world. The Inferior positions of parties in the contract bring about a serious imbalance with regard to the freedom of conclusion of a contract and decision contents of a contract. With these injustices in mind, the purpose of this study is to make a justification of contract contents by setting consistent limitations on the principle of free will in the contract. Because legal regulations tend to be mostly vague and abstract, however, contract disputes that occur in legal practice cannot be fully settled under the conventional contract laws. In this regard, the main theme of this study is to establish legal theories that can close the gap between positive law and the idealism of serving justice. Essential to this legal objective is the legal principle of good faith. This principle, however, tends to be extremely abstract and overgeneralize because of which this principle has been criticized for undermining legal stability. In spite of this, the principle of good faith should be applied to correct or repair imbalances if contract contents or legal regulations do not correspond to specific social justices. The principle of good faith imposes specific obligations upon the parties in contract relations. This principle levies certain collateral obligations on even the parties who are arranging to conclude contracts. As a basis for discussion and theorization in this study Professor Macneil's Relational Contract Theory is referred to and quoted.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (65)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0