메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국조직신학회 한국조직신학논총 한국조직신학논총 제25호
발행연도
2009.1
수록면
33 - 72 (40page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
It is important for the christianity to have the same confession about the trinitarian God. By confessing the same trinitarian creed, the identity of the christianity can be insisted among the religious mixture phenomena through contact with various cultures and religions. But unfortunately, the different perspective of the procession of the Holy Spirit with the relation of God the Father caused to split christianity into two parts, namely Roman-Catholic and Orthodoxy that have characterized two different spiritualities from one another. In this situation, first, it is the purpose of this thesis to recognize the hermeneutical meaning of the “filioque” interpolated in the Constantinople Creed in the context of the establishing the trinitarian Creed. And secondly, through this consideration, it is the aim to disclose a hermeneutical possibility of the ‘filioque’ for the Korean Theology. Already it is known that the filioque is through the On the one hand, it is certain that the theological understanding of the trinitarian God can be fully recognized by the expression of the of the Nicea Creed. On the another hand, the Constantinople Creed is to be understood as the creed that is constituted in the continuity of the Nicean understanding of the trinitarian God. Therefore, in spite of the difference of the paradigm of the describing the relationship of the essence of God with the three persons of God, it is quite necessary to see the divinity of the Holy Spirit in the connection with the Son of God who is revealed through the historical person, Jesus of Nazareth. This confirms the soteriological work of the trinitarian God in the church and, moreover, the eschatological perspective of the saving reality of the trinitarian God. The continuity of the Necea Creed and Constantinople Creed affords us a possibility that we can interpret the filioque interpolation of the west church into the Constantinople Creed as the complete interpretation of Constantinople Creed. In the sight of the historical development after the admit of the Constantinople Creed as the ecumenical Creed it is noticed that the east and west church try to reach to the agreement about the meaning of trinitarian personality of God. It means that the deity of the Holy Spirit can be understood basically in the reciprocal relationship with the Son of God in western Situation. And this did not contradict the eastern viewpoint of the relations between the tree persons of God which designate God the Father as the ultimate ground of the deity. With the conflict case of Photius, the understanding of the divinity of the Holy Spirit is basically divided. From that moment, filioque has been no longer acceptable for the eastern church. In recent time, the contemporary theologians, for the unity of the church, propose that the understanding of the divine Life can include the different assertions about the procession of the Holy Spirit by east and west churches. But the life of trinitarian God must be organized through the event of Jesus Christ, if it is not fallen out of the soteriological standpoint. It means that the filioque understanding as the expression of the correspondence between the immanent trinity and economic trinity is also important to constitute the ordering of divine life in itself.
#필리오케 #호모우시오스 #인격 #실체 #페리코레시스 #Filioque #homoousios #Person #Substance #Perichoresis

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (39)

참고문헌 신청
Alston, William P. / 1999 / Substance and the Trinity in: The Trinity: An Interdisciplinary Symposium on the Trinity / Oxford University Press google schola Barth, K. / 1993 / Kirchliche Dogmatik. IV. 1. Zurich: Theologischer Verlag, 1993 google schola Coakley, Sarah / 1999 / ‘Persons’ in the ‘Social’ Doctrine of the Trinity: A Critique of Current Analytic Discussion / The Trinity: An Interdisciplinary Symposium on the Trini google schola Congar, Yves M. J. / 1983 / I believe in the Holy Spirit. Vol. I I I / The Seabury Press google schola Courth, Franz / 1988 / Trinitat In der Schrift und Patristik. Handbuch der Dogmengeschichte Hrg. v. Michael Schmaus und a., Freiburg, Basel, Wien: Herder 1988 google schola

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0