메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국생물교육학회 생물교육 생물교육 제40권 제3호
발행연도
2012.1
수록면
367 - 383 (17page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Current study investigated the effect of the instructional use of Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) on improving scientific inquiry skills, logical thinking and metacognition of middle school students. This study drew conclusions as follows: Firstly, SWH had a positve effect on improving scientific inquiry skills. Through SWH, students could express and organize their thoughts, which was helpful on stimulating their scientific inquiry skills. However, its effect was limited only to the high-achieving student group (p<.01), and it was not effective on the low-achieving student group (p>.05). We hypothesized that increased amount of writing on each steps of SWH was counter-effective to low-achieving student group. Secondly, SWH was found to be effective on logical thinking to both the high-achieving students group and the low-achieving students group (p<.01). Through organizing their thought in writing and having an in-depth discussion with peers, students were able to improve their logical thinking. Lastly, SWH’s positive role on improving the metacognition of the high-achieving students group (p<.05), but it was not the case for, the low-achieving student group (p>.05). Considering the fact that SWH method asks students to reflect on their own activity and thought, we assumed that low-achieving students might have needed a list of questions that is appropriate to their level, but further investigation is needed.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (34)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0