메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국생물교육학회 생물교육 생물교육 제38권 제3호
발행연도
2010.1
수록면
455 - 466 (12page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The main purpose of this study was to investigate whether there were effective differences between the written form and the concept map in the instructional materials for biology. For this study, 189 high school girls of eight classes (10th graders) were sampled from a high school in Seoul, Korea. The students were divided into four groups. Group A (48 students) was offered non-hierarchically described reading material, Group B (47 students) was offered hierarchically described reading material, Group C (48 students) who were unfamiliar with concept map was offered concept maps, and Group D (46 students) who were familiar with concept map was offered concept maps. The results showed, first, for the concept map group (Group C & D), the average of the post test was 16.1 points out of 35, and the average of the retention test was 11.0 points out of 35, which was higher than the post test average (14.1 points) and the retention test average (8.2 points) of the written form group (Group A & B). There were no significant statistical differences between Group A and B in the average of the post test and in the average of the retention test. Second, the retention test average of Group D (11.0 points) was higher than that of Group A & B. On the other hand, there was no significant statistical difference between Group C and D in the average of the retention test. In conclusion, this study showed that providing students with concept maps in biology instructional materials allowed them to learn the material meaningfully and was effective in long-term retention.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (20)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0