메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background/Aims:Long-term antiarrhythmic drug therapy remains the principal approach for suppressing atrial fibrillation (AF) and maintaining sinus rhythm. In this study, we examined the differing electrophysiological effects of various antiarrhythmic drugs on the cardiac chamber and atrial selectivity in patients with AF. Methods:We analyzed 134 patients (60.4 ± 12.5 years, M:F = 1.14:1) who were administered a single antiarrhythmic agent for AF over 6 months: amiodarone (group A), flecainide (group F), or propafenone (group P). The P wave, QRS complex duration and dispersion, and QT interval and its dispersion were evaluated using a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram. Results:There was no significant difference in age, gender ratio, or associated diseases among the three groups. In group A, Pmax, Pmin, P dispersion, QRSmax, QRSmin, and QRS dispersion were shorter than in groups F and P, whereas Pmax/QRSmax was the highest in group A (A = 1.2, F = 0.9, P = 1.0; p < 0.01). QTcmax and QTcmin were longer in group A, whereas QTc dispersion and the QT peak to end (A = 13.3 ± 11.2, F = 30.7 ± 24.9, P = 31.8 ± 21.6; p < 0.01) were shorter in group A than in the other groups. Conclusions:Amiodarone had a weaker, but more selective, inhibitory effect on intra-atrial conduction, and inhibited ventricular repolarization more effectively and homogenously than flecainide or propafenone. These differing electrophysiological effects may contribute to the superior effectiveness and safety of amiodarone over flecainide or propafenone. (Korean J Med 2011;80:672-679)

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (22)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0