메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background and Objectives:Universal newborn hearing screening is widely accepted due to socioeconomic harm of congenital (AABR) is accept-able method for newborn hearing screning and to check the presence of potential false negative cases by using another criterion considering sweep number. Subjects and Method:Among 3761 neonates who were born from March 2004 to December 2005, 3053 healthy neonates (81.18%) whose parents agred to hearing screning protocol were screned with AABR. Failed neonates (refer) at first stage test and neonates showing high sweep number (>4000) on repeated test were received second stage retest tested with conventional ABR as a confirmative study within 3 months. Results:94 neonates (3.08%) were failed and 180 neonates (5.89%) showed high swep number on first stage ABR test. On second stage ABR test, neonates with final refer result were 46 (1.51%) and neonates with final high sweep number result were 44 (1.44%). Neonates with threshold of over 30 dB at ABR were 14 among final refer group and 5 among final high swep number group. Thre bilateral profound hearing showed moderate hearing loss. There is no clear relationship between predicting false negative case and sweep number. Conclusion:Our current two stage AABR test is useful tol for newborn hearing screening with acceptable referral rate and positive predictive value. False negative cases detected through our protocol have no clear relationship with high swep number. (Korean J Otolaryngol 2007 ;50 :108-14)

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (19)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0