메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국언어과학회 언어과학 언어과학 제21권 제3호
발행연도
2014.1
수록면
97 - 116 (20page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study aims at exploring the grammaticality recognition of the L2 learners of Korean on the transitive locative structures. Argument alignment and locative alternation have been postulated as two linguistic contexts to design 12 locative verb sentences. 20 Korean native speakers(NKs) and 40 L1 Chinese learners of Korean(CKs) participated in the study. Research questions of the study are as below: RQ 1. Do CKs show different grammaticality judgments on locative structures compared to NKs do in terms of argument alignment and locative alternation? RQ 2. Is there L2 variation of language proficiency in the grammaticality judgments of the CK high group and that of CK low group? The results regarding RQ 1 showed that CKs exhibited significantly lower grammaticality judgment than NKs did regardless of the linguistic contexts. This implies that further attention on teaching of locative structures needs to be provided to the L2 learners. For RQ 2, CK low group showed significantly low grammaticality judgment on the sentences in unmarked contexts such as typical argument alignment structures and alternation structures. However, the grammaticality judgment of CK low and high groups were not consistant in non-alternation structures when they were compared to that in the other marked context, non-typical argument alignment structures. It implies that markedness hypothesis regarding typicalness of argument alignment in L2 acquisition is valid but not with locative alternation

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (28)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0