Realigning the U.S. Forces and South Korea's Defense Reform 2020

남창희

추천

검색

자료유형: 학술저널

저자정보: 남창희

저널정보: 한국국방연구원 The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis 제19권 제1호

발행연도: 2007.1

수록면: 165 - 189 (25page)

이용수

📌

연구주제

📖

연구배경

🔬

연구방법

🏆

연구결과

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기

In the aftermath of the September 11 attacks, the Pentagon came up with the Global Defense Posture Review in an effort to effectively deal with the terrorist threats. The U.S. Defense Department’s strong commitment to the military transformation stems from America’s successful wars in Kosovo and Afghanistan. The idea of network-centric warfare for speed-oriented effect-based operations necessitated the Pentagon to change America’s global footprints toward reshaping its military to be able to rapidly respond to the elusive and transnational threats. The U.S. Forces in Korea (USFK) accordingly proceeded to relocate the heavily armed division-strong ground forces (2nd Infantry Division) near the DMZ to south of the Han River where expeditionary airlift or sealift would be readily provided. Facing growing concerns among senior Koreans over decreased readiness against North Korea’s surprise attack, the USFK promised to introduce 140 new items of highly lethal and effective ISRPGMs assets to Korea. At the same time, the ROK armed forces are required to increase their combat capability and to assume more responsibility for defense on the peninsula, which is heralded by the 10 mission transfers from the USFK, including for example, the counter-artillery operations command mission. In 2005, the ROK Ministry of National Defense made public a Korean-version of the military transformation in the name of Defense Reform 2020. Different from the Pentagon’s grand plan, the ROK military’s transformation is confined to comprise primarily an ambitious weaponry modernization and building network-centric forces. Denial strategy with sufficient capabilities for defense operations in and around the peninsula was embedded in the program, which in its design process excluded longrange mobility assets and an offensive posture. Should the ROK military succeed in transforming its armed forces to be truly network-centric, and thus sufficiently interoperable with the USFK, South Korea will remain as a crucial security partner for the United States in Northeast Asia. Furthermore, holding fast the competent military of the ROK, a success story of American engagement in Asia, the Pentagon’s diplomatic war on terrorism in the arc of instability will be much more successful.

In the aftermath of the September 11 attacks, the Pentagon came up with the Global Defense Posture Review in an effort to effectively deal with the terrorist threats. The U.S. Defense Department’s strong commitment to the military transformation stems from America’s successful wars in Kosovo and Afghanistan. The idea of network-centric warfare for speed-oriented effect-based operations necessitated the Pentagon to change America’s global footprints toward reshaping its military to be able to rapidly respond to the elusive and transnational threats. The U.S. Forces in Korea (USFK) accordingly proceeded to relocate the heavily armed division-strong ground forces (2nd Infantry Division) near the DMZ to south of the Han River where expeditionary airlift or sealift would be readily provided. Facing growing concerns among senior Koreans over decreased readiness against North Korea’s surprise attack, the USFK promised to introduce 140 new items of highly lethal and effective ISRPGMs assets to Korea. At the same time, the ROK armed forces are required to increase their combat capability and to assume more responsibility for defense on the peninsula, which is heralded by the 10 mission transfers from the USFK, including for example, the counter-artillery operations command mission. In 2005, the ROK Ministry of National Defense made public a Korean-version of the military transformation in the name of Defense Reform 2020. Different from the Pentagon’s grand plan, the ROK military’s transformation is confined to comprise primarily an ambitious weaponry modernization and building network-centric forces. Denial strategy with sufficient capabilities for defense operations in and around the peninsula was embedded in the program, which in its design process excluded longrange mobility assets and an offensive posture. Should the ROK military succeed in transforming its armed forces to be truly network-centric, and thus sufficiently interoperable with the USFK, South Korea will remain as a crucial security partner for the United States in Northeast Asia. Furthermore, holding fast the competent military of the ROK, a success story of American engagement in Asia, the Pentagon’s diplomatic war on terrorism in the arc of instability will be much more successful.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

참고문헌이 DBpia에서 서비스 중이라면, [참고문헌 신청]을 통해 등록해보세요

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

남창희

소속기관 한국국방연구원

주요연구분야 사회과학 > 군사학

논문수 2 이용수 2

최근 본 자료

전체보기

구분	그룹	데이터 항목
AI 학습용 데이터	원문	원문 PDF 파일
AI 학습용 데이터	원문 + 메타 (기본/상세)	원문 PDF 파일 및 서지정보 CSV
대량 구매용 데이터	B2B 구독 방식	특정 자료 한정으로 원문 접근 권한 부여
대량 구매용 데이터	URL 전달 방식	바로 PDF 뷰어를 열람할 수 있는 URL 제공

구분	그룹	데이터 항목
AI 학습용 데이터	기본 메타	발행기관명, 간행물명, 권호명, 권(vol), 호(issue), 통권, 발행연도, 발행월, 논문명, 저자명, 시작페이지, 종료페이지, 전체페이지, 상세페이지URL
상세 메타 데이터	발행기관 메타	발행기관 이명, 영문명, 창립연도, 홈페이지URL, 발행기관 소개
	간행물 메타	부제목, 간행물 유형, ISSN, ISBN, 최초발행연도, 폐간연도, 간행빈도, 발행주기, 등재사항, 이용수, 피인용수, 권호수, 논문수, 표지이미지
	논문 메타	작성 언어, 부제목, 대등제목, 목차, 키워드, 초록, 이미지, 참고문헌, 이용수, 피인용수, 논문활용도, DBpia통합주제분류, KDC분류, DDC분류, 한국연구재단분류, UCI, DOI
	저자 메타	소속기관, 소속부서, 직급, 연구분야, 연구키워드, 이용수, 피인용수, 저자 논문활용도

구분	그룹	데이터 항목
※ 결합형/맞춤형 메타 데이터는 신청 내용에 따라 다양하게 제공 가능
이용순위 정보	주제분야별 많이 이용된 논문	“인문학”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
	이용기관별 많이 이용된 논문	“중고등학교”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
	세부기관별 많이 이용된 논문	“서울대학교”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
	키워드별 많이 이용된 논문	“Chat GPT”에서 많이 이용된 논문 TOP100
키워드 정보	많이 이용된 키워드	특정기간/분야/저널 내 많이 이용된 키워드
	많이 발행된 키워드	특정기간/분야/저널 내 많이 발행된 키워드
	많이 검색된 키워드	특정기간/분야/저널 내 많이 검색된 키워드
	연구 트렌드 키워드	특정 키워드 연관 연구동향 분석 데이터 키워드

논문 기본 정보

초록· 키워드

AI 요약

연구주제

연구배경

연구방법

연구결과

주요내용

목차

참고문헌 (0)

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

댓글(0)