지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this article, Professor Hayashi Mikito of the most recent publication of the paper is related to economic crimes. Japan has been performed Antitrust Law since 1947. However, for the penalty provisions were never applied since the law(Antitrust Law) was practiced. Penalty provision is dormant for 30 years and finally asked in 1980 the High Court ruling applies to the first. This article is written in the wake of this decision.
Japan's Antimonopoly Act was accepted in the United States Sherman Act. Sherman Act, like Japan, have been imposed penalties to Monopoly and trade restrictions. Sherman Act's has imposed the penalty more frequently than Japan. However, Sherman Act of punishment has been changed in recent years. It summed up the expansion of criminal penalties. In this paper I will introduce these new movements. And apply penalties in the antitrust laws is to reflections on.
This paper is composed as follows : (Ⅱ) I will overview that the history of Sherman Act's punishment. The Act is being operated will be examined. (Ⅲ) This chapter, I will study why Sherman Act's penalty could not be actively applies until recently, for reasons will be discussed. Also Packer as its centerpiece a look at the characteristics of white-collar crime. And for this part should also review the situation in Japan. (Ⅳ) I will be reviewed the inflation and about the relationship between antitrust policy. And on this point is to introduce the situation of the United States. (Ⅴ) This chapter, for the clarity of criminal punishment is to be studied.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (31)
참고문헌 신청
Arnold / 1940 / Antitrust Law Enforcement, Past and Future / Law & Contemp. Prob 7 (5) : 16 ~
Baker / 1978 / To Indict or not to Indict: Prosecutorial Discretion in Sherman Act Enforcement / Cornell L. Rev 63
Berge / 1940 / Remedies Available to the Government Under the Sherman Act / Law & Contemp. Prob 7 (104)
Breit / 1973 / Antitrust penalties and attitudes toward risk: an economic analysis / Harv. L.Rev 86
Cahill / 1952 / Must We Brand American Business by Indictment as Criminals? / ABA Antitrust Section 1 (26)
Baker / 1978 / To Indict or not to Indict: Prosecutorial Discretion in Sherman Act Enforcement / Cornell L. Rev 63
Berge / 1940 / Remedies Available to the Government Under the Sherman Act / Law & Contemp. Prob 7 (104)
Breit / 1973 / Antitrust penalties and attitudes toward risk: an economic analysis / Harv. L.Rev 86
Cahill / 1952 / Must We Brand American Business by Indictment as Criminals? / ABA Antitrust Section 1 (26)
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0