메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
전북대학교 동북아법연구소 동북아법연구 동북아법연구 제6권 제1호
발행연도
2012.1
수록면
193 - 224 (32page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
How to determine the validity of foreign-related arbitration agreements in China remains a hot issue in China in recent years, which covers mainly two topics: who and which law will determine such a question. This article analyses the relevant competent authorities and the conflict rules in determining such a question under the current Chinese legal framework. The author first points out the problems existed in the jurisdiction and conflict rules in determining the validity of arbitration agreements, then examines the defficiencies in the stipulation about the validity of an arbitration agreement in China's Arbitration Law. Based on the analysis, the author suggest that for the sound development of the international commercial arbitration in China, the number and competence of the courts to determine the validity of arbitration agreements be limited; the arbitral institutions be given priority in determining such an issue when arbitration takes place in China; the conflict rules be drafted in accordance with those contained in the 1958 New York Convention and the opportunity of the application of the lexfori(the Chinese law) be reduced; when the Chinese law is applicable to the determine the validity of arbitrationagreements, the Chinese courts adopt the liberal interpretation instead of the restrictive one. For the long run, the Arbitration Law had better be amended, the competence/competence principle should be completely adopted, the stipulation on the designating of the arbitral institutions should be deleted, and the party autonomy should be fully respected.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (5)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0