지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
The Why-stripping construction consists of why and a remnant but conveys the same propositional content as fully sentential source, inducing form-meaning mismatch. Similar to other ellipsis phenomena such as sluicing, the construction thus allows to unexpress clausal material, but the unexpressed, elided material needs to be recovered in a proper way. This paper discusses two different approaches for the analysis of the Why-stripping in English and Korean: ellipsis and direct interpretation approaches. Discussing several key empirical facts, the paper argues for a direct interpretation (DI) approach, couched upon the framework of Construction-based HPSG and an independently motivated theory of dialogue context.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (16)
참고문헌 신청
Culicover, Peter / 2005 / Simpler Syntax / Oxford University Press
Ginzburg, Jonathan / 2000 / Interrogative investigations / CSLI Publications
Ginzburg, Jonathan / 2012 / The Interactive Stance: Meaning for Conversation / Oxford University Press
Jacobson, Pauline / 2016 / The short answer: implications for direct compositionality (and vice versa) / Language 92 (2) : 331 ~ 375
Kim, Jong-Bok / 2015 / Syntactic and semantic identity in Korean sluicing: A direct interpretation approach / Lingua 66 : 260 ~ 293
Ginzburg, Jonathan / 2000 / Interrogative investigations / CSLI Publications
Ginzburg, Jonathan / 2012 / The Interactive Stance: Meaning for Conversation / Oxford University Press
Jacobson, Pauline / 2016 / The short answer: implications for direct compositionality (and vice versa) / Language 92 (2) : 331 ~ 375
Kim, Jong-Bok / 2015 / Syntactic and semantic identity in Korean sluicing: A direct interpretation approach / Lingua 66 : 260 ~ 293
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
Fragments in Korean: A Direct Interpretation Approach
생성문법연구
2015 .01
-
English if (not)-stripping Constructions: A Direct Interpretation Approach
영어학
2022 .01
-
Concessive although-stripping and its theoretical implications
언어연구
2023 .06
-
Why-stripping in English: A corpus-based perspective
언어연구
2019 .01
-
Negative Stripping in English: A Corpus-based Approach
언어와 정보
2021 .11
-
Why -Stripping in Korean: A Division of Labor between Syntax and Processing
언어
2021 .03
-
The In-situ Analysis of Why-stripping
생성문법연구
2022 .08
-
On Swiping in English: A Direct Interpretation Approach8
생성문법연구
2020 .11
-
Why-최소공백화 : TP 생략과 섬제약 효과
영어학
2017 .07
-
A Corpus Study of the English Negative Stripping Construction and its Theoretical Consequences
영어학
2021 .01
-
Beyond In-Situ: Exploring Movement in Why-stripping
언어학
2024 .03
-
한국어 스트리핑 구문의 복합명사구 제약 효과
언어과학
2021 .01
-
영어 대조 스트리핑 구문－(Al)though와 Except를 중심으로
인문과학연구
2022 .03
-
Why-Stripping and the Articulated CP Structure
영어학
2017 .07
-
A hybrid ellipsis analysis of two types of fragments in Korean
언어연구
2017 .01
-
Negative Stripping in Korean: A Non-ellipsis, Anaphoric Analysis
언어
2019 .09
-
Fragment questions: A direct interpretation approach
언어연구
2021 .12
-
VP Ellipsis Always Precedes Reprise Fragment Ellipsis
생성문법연구
2022 .02
-
“왜-XP?” 구문의 특성: 직접 해석 접근법을 중심으로
인문과학연구
2017 .12
-
The timing of XP ellipsis is not fixed: Evidence from English
언어연구
2024 .03
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0