메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국영어학학회 영어학연구 영어학연구 제19권 제3호
발행연도
2013.1
수록면
87 - 109 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The present study is concerned with the less and amount constructions that are used with plural count nouns, like less students and ... amount of people, etc. We found out, through the examination of the large-scale corpora such as COCA, COHA, BNC, that these constructions are not new usages and are not increasing these days, contrary to Foster (1968: 217-18), Bauer (2002), Mair and Leech (2006: 320) and others. It is clear that these constructions cannot be ignored as mere speech errors. They have been used for a long time in English. Our argument is that the constant use of these constructions is not ascribed to the changes of less and amount themselves, but to the recategorization/respecification/ reclassification of plural nouns into singular nouns in certain circumstances through semantic extension. The phenomenon of nouns shifting from the category mass to count (e.g. two coffees) is relatively well-known. We argue here that the vice-versa recategorization is possible, as Huddleston and Pullum (2002: 346, 354) and Quirk et al. (1985: 309-10) argue, too. The main evidence for this argument is that other quantifiers such as much, (a) little, deal of and quantity of, which are normally used with non-count singular nouns, can be used with plural count nouns, too, just like less and amount (e.g. (how) much Americans). And we also found that nearly the same specific group of nouns are used with both less and much in their plural forms. Our conclusion is that the much + plural construction might have been the source construction for the less + plural or the amount of + plural constructions.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (11)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0