메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
중앙아시아학회 중앙아시아연구 중앙아시아연구 제14권
발행연도
2009.1
수록면
55 - 84 (30page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This study is to analyze the beginning and the end of Inner Mongolia integration movement of Bogd's government developed after the declaration of independence in 1911. In 1911, the leading members of the declaration of independence set integration of Mongols as a dominant goal of independence from the stage of planning and plotting it. Therefore, for Bogd's government, the most important assignment after the declaration of independence was to integrate the whole Mongolians under the control of the Qing dynasty including Inner Mongolia and to be recognized as an independent country by foreign countries including the Qing dynasty (which later became the Republic of China). To achieve these, by August of 1911, Bogd's government unified the whole area of West Mongolia such as Uliastai and Khovd by force, and then tried to unite the whole Inner Mongolia through various ways like encouraging people to return voluntarily, negotiating with Russia through diplomatic channels, dispatching an army, and so on. As a result, Inner Mongolia integration movement of Bogd's government was failed. This historical event, however, deeply affected the development in the later history of Mongol over the failure itself. With the final and last attempt to integrate by force, the national integration movement of Bogd's government was actually finished, which made Khalkh and Inner Mongolia take their own courses as two different countries. The reason Bogd's government could not succeed in national unification was, of course, objection of the Republic of China and Russia. Bogd's government was too weak to keep Khalkh independent, so it was impossible to unify Inner Mongolia as the two big countries are against it. However, it also is not the accurate judge of the situation at that time to blame only foreign countries for everything about the failure on national integration. There is lack of persuasion and it is hard to agree because this is excluding the role of Mongolians in the history of Mongol. The Mongolians cannot be freed from their responsibility for the failure on national unification though it must be difficult for them to improve their own destiny in the complicated situation that Russia and Japan were struggling and the Republic of China was claiming the suzerainty on them. In regard of this, we need to keep it in mind that Inner Mongolian princes did try not to disconnect the relationship with China. On the contrary, the commons positively supported the independence of Khalkh. This tells us that princes of Inner Mongolia should be blamed for the failure on unification in many aspects. In fact, some of princes refused to join Bogd's government in the first place, while some others finally turned to the side of the Republic of China after all the hesitation of choosing between Bogd's government and China. That is because of the political and economical interests started from the Qing dynasty era. Also, the reluctance against the independence led by Khalkh was the big reason for princes of Inner Mongolia to refuse to unite Bogd's government. In this point of view, so-called 'divide and rule policy'(分而治之) of the Qing Dynasty can be regarded as quite success. Then, the gap in recognition of the opponent that lied between the two would be another reason which cannot be ignored for the failure of Inner Mongolia integration. As a result of this, 'Mongolian nationalism' which could join Mongol together was difficult to rise. In case of Khalkh, they could keep some of the regional integration, while Inner Mongolia couldn't unite internally because it was neighboring inland of China or the Qing Dynasty kept interfering. Actually, that the nationalism couldn't rise up was the reason why the struggle against cultivating the pastures developed in various places of Inner Mongolia around the 20th century couldn't be unified as an integrated force. I think this is the another reason for princes of Inner Mongolia couldn't willingly agree the independence led by Khalkh.
#내몽골 통합 운동 #복드 정부 #할하 #내몽골 왕공 #청조 #러시아 #중화민국 #Inner Mongolia integration movement #Bogd's government #Khalkh #Inner Mongolian princes #Qing dynasty #Russia #Republic of China

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (48)

참고문헌 신청
[단행본 google schola / / 外交部當 / 中央硏究員近代史硏究所 google schola / / 政府公報 google schola / / 盛京時報 google schola / 1982 / ony undesnii erkh choloo tusgaar togtnolyn toloo temchel, Barimt bichig emkhetgel 1900～1914 / Ulsyn khevleliin gazar google schola

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0