메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국근대영미소설학회 근대영미소설 근대영미소설 제22권 제2호
발행연도
2015.1
수록면
139 - 157 (19page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This essay discusses Melville’s view of “prudence” and “charity” in “Bartleby, the Scrivener,” the moral virtues originating from Classical humanism and Christianity. The narrator’s predicament of helping Bartleby in the story exposes his flawed conceptualization of prudence and charity whose meaning underwent a significant change during nineteenth-century America. The narrator’s blindness to the truth behind Bartleby’s dejection proves his lack of prudence, which in Classical humanism means the moral force to see through the surface appearances, according to Dosia Reichardt (43). His material notion of charity, in accordance with the market logic and Adam Smith’s moral economy, also contradicts the biblical sense of charity as boundless love with no earthly payback possible. His incomprehension of prudence and charity in their true meaning cripples his endeavor to reach Bartleby’s “soul” (22). Yet, his affective investment in Bartleby pays in the end through his own spiritual salvation, ironically done in loss and not by gains. Consequently, the story’s ending, called “the sequel,” completes the narrative design to emphasize the narrator’s awakening to the truth that he has not been a benefactor but a beneficiary of charity, bequeathed by Bartleby through suffering and despair.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (23)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0