메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국근대영미소설학회 근대영미소설 근대영미소설 제19권 제2호
발행연도
2012.1
수록면
125 - 142 (18page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This essay aims to examine Hawthorne’s interrogation of idealism and history in his short stories, especially “Earth’s Holocaust” which has been neglected by critics. For this purpose, this article interrogates his stance on the contemporary reform movement and the reform because his ideas about idealism and history are entwined with his attitude toward the reform. I also investigate Hawthorne’s idea about the act of writing revealed in the narrative form because it represents his ideas about idealism and history in his writings. Hawthorne is critical of the contemporary reform movement and the reform. Rather than objecting to the reform itself, Hawthorne criticizes the fact that the reformers insist only on their own voice, suppressing and silencing the others’ voices. Hawthorne illustrates that, through the process that one dominant voice silences all the other voices, swung by idealism, history can be a ‘nightmare.’Hawthorne also never allows one voice to dominate the whole narrative in his act of writing. He never lets one voice dominate the readers’ act of reading. Thus, Hawthorne never fixes his mouthpiece on one character such as the narrator or the observer, and represents his thoughts through multi-voices of the characters including the minor characters. By making various strata of meanings between the statement and what he really thinks, Hawthorne allows and sometimes forces the readers to participate in the interpretation of the story through their act of reading. In this sense it could be said that Hawthorne’s attitude toward idealism and history realizes itself in his act of writing.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (17)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0