메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
대구사학회 대구사학 대구사학 제86권
발행연도
2007.1
수록면
261 - 288 (28page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
This essay critically examines three representative contributions to the matters of scientific modernity with emphasis on the Baconian concept of knowledge/ power. Against the feminist criticism of the sexist nature of Baconian science represented by Carolyn Merchant, the 'gentlemen thesis' of Steven Shapin focused on the classist nature of it, and the nationalist/imperialist impulses of it mentioned by Benjamin Farrington, Friedrich Heer, Julian Martin et al., I try to reinterpret the progressive nature and modernity of Baconian science. I argues that the critics of Bacon have made attention to the symmetry in the analogical transition from social elements of power such as sexim, classism, and nationalism/imperialism to the natural world, that is, the extension of those social elements to the natural world through experiment, establishing-process of natural facts or truths, exploitation of natural resources, and so on. In contrast to their social constructivism, I analyse the asymmetry of that kind of analogy with underscoring that the idea of progress was being formed within such space of difference between the social elements and the natural elements. Although Bacon often mentions the masculinity and gentlemanhood of natural science and stresses on the 'greatness of state', it never means that his natural science and idea of progress is relied on sexim, classim, or nationalism/imperialism.(Kyungnam University/sebong@kyungnam.ac.kr)

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (0)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0