지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this study, comparison between new words of Japanese and Korean from 2003to 2005 in terms of word type was carried out, especially, focusing in word typeand pattern of word compound of the constituent elements of compound word onthe loanblend.
Word type of both Japanese and Korean consist of native words, Chinese words,foreign words, and loanblend, and loanblend tend to increase in recent new words.
I realized that ｢Chinese word + foreign word｣ and ｢Chinese word + native word｣ismost coupling word type of loanblend in the case of the constituent elements orderwas ignored and coupling rate of Chinese word is highest. In the case of theconstituent elements order was considered, coupling type of ｢foreign word + Chineseword｣, ｢native word + Chinese word｣, ｢Chinese word + foreign word｣, ｢Chineseword + Chinese word｣, ｢Chinese word + native word｣ comprised a large proportionin coupling type of new words. And ｢foreign word + Chinese word｣, ｢native word+ Chinese word｣, ｢Chinese word + foreign word｣, ｢Chinese word + native word｣ismajor coupling type in new words. These are similarity between Japanese andKorean.
First constituent elements in the new words of Korean shows similar ratio amongevery word type, whereas use of Chinese word is much in first constituent elementsin the new words of Japanese.
Coupling type of Japanese and Korean is similar. However, proportion of eachcoupling type is quite different. This difference is expected to be a phenomenon dueto differences in components. I left this expectation as a future left.
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌 (26)
참고문헌 신청
이 논문의 저자 정보
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0