메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류
인문학
인문학 일반 역사학 철학 종교학 어문학 기타 인문학
사회과학
사회과학 일반 경영학 관광학 교육학 군사학 문헌정보학 법학 사회학 신문방송학 심리과학 정치외교학 지리학 행정학 경제학 무역학 인류학 기타 사회과학
자연과학
자연과학 일반 물리학 생물학 생활과학 수학·통계학 천문학 지구과학 화학 기타 자연과학
공학
공학 일반 건축공학 기계공학 산업공학 재료·에너지공학 전기전자공학 조선해양공학 화학공학 컴퓨터학 기타공학
의약학
의학 일반 간호학 수의학 약학 한의학 기초의학 임상의학 기타 의약학
농수해양학
농수해양학 일반 농학 수산학 식품과학 임학 축산학 해상운송학 기타 농수해양학
예술체육학
예술 일반 디자인 미술 미용 사진 음악학 의상 체육 공연매체예술 기타 예술체육학
복합학
학제간연구 과학기술학 뇌인지과학 기술정책 기타 복합학

ENG

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국경영법률학회 경영법률 경영법률 제23권 제1호
발행연도
2012.1
수록면
237 - 263 (27page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
The person elected as a director at a general meeting of shareholders who did not sign an employment contract between him and the corporation required a meeting of Board of Directors. This is the fact of the Supreme Court’s case(대법원 2011.7.28. 선고 2009다86918 판결), and one of the issues the Supreme Court faced was when the person elected as a director legally acquires office of the corporation’s director who is able to legally require a meeting of board of directors. However, the Supreme Court put on hold direct judgment regarding this issue for the following reason. In the lawsuit that the corporation's director filed against the Corporation, the effect that a CEO who was not an auditor of the corporation conducted the legal proceeding on behalf of the corporation and the effect that a director brought a lawsuit against a CEO who was not a auditor of the corporation are void. Thus, the Supreme Court with ex officio judgment remanded after reversal. Although the Supreme Court put on hold direct judgment regarding this issue, this issue will be still debatable in the future. Thus, this article focuses on whether the person elected as a director can legally acquire office of the corporation’s director without signing an employment contract between him and the corporation. In detail, part II reviews the Supreme Court’s cases and confrontation of legal theories regarding the issue whether the person elected as a director can legally acquire office of the corporation’s director with signing an employment contract between him and the corporation, or not. Part III discusses the moment to acquire office of corporation’s director under the U.S. case laws. Part IV addresses the requirement to acquire office of corporation’s director under French laws. Part V discusses problems of Supreme Court’s position that the person elected as a director legally acquires office of the corporation’s director after signing an employment contract between him and the corporation, and suggests the methods to solve these problems. Part VI, as a conclusion, proposes that Supreme Court should change its current position to the other position that the person elected as a director legally acquires office of the corporation’s director without signing an employment contract between him and the corporation.
#이사의 지위 #Office of Director) #고용계약 #Employment Contract) #대법원 #Supreme Court of Korea) #이사의 선임 #Appointment of Director) #주주총회 #General Meeting of Shareholder)

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (32)

참고문헌 신청
Anne Tucket Nees / 2010 / Who's the Boss? Unmasking Oversight Liability Within the Corporate Puzzle / Del. J. Corp. L 35 : 199 ~ google schola Bernard S. Sharfman / 2008 / Dysfunctional Deference and Board Composition: Lessons from Enron / NW. U. L. REV. COLLOQUY 103 : 153 ~ google schola Bernard S. Sharfman / 2009 / A Team Production Approach to Corporate Law and Board Composition / NW. U. L. REV. COLLOQUY 103 : 380 ~ google schola Evelyn Brody / 2007 / The Board of Nonprofit Organizations: Puzzling Through the Gaps Between Law and Practice / FORDHAM L. REV 76 : 521 ~ google schola Jessica Erickson / 2008 / Corporate Misconduct and the Perfect Storm of Shareholder Litigation / NOTRE DAME L. REV 84 : 75 ~ google schola

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0