메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국형사법학회 형사법연구 형사법연구 제21권 제2호
발행연도
2009.1
수록면
195 - 226 (32page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Korean Criminal Procedure Law(KCPL) has newly introduced criminal discovery rules similar to U.S. federal system since 2008.1.1. According to KCPL, the defendant or his attorney has the right to access all documents and matters related to the guilt and sentencing facts in government possession. When the prosecutor denies defendant's request to disclose or limit the scope of discovery, the trial court has authority to order discovery upon defendant's request. And KCPL §266-4 (5) provides that when the prosecutor has failed to comply with court's order to discovery, the prosecutor is forbidden to introduce evidence related to the undisclosed documents or matters. Now we are confronted with an important problem. When the prosecutor denies to disclose any information or matter other than which it will use at trial in spite of court order to discovery, the sanction according to KCPL §266-4 (5) is not sufficient to guarantee defendant's right to discovery. As a result, the defence substantially cannot access any information exculpatory or favorable to his case. This paper aims to review appropriate sanctions or remedies to the discovery violation by prosecutor. The followings are suggested : the trial court has to order immediate disclosure, grant a continuance, and search and seizure warrant may be utilized at further step. Especially where the prosecution violation is serious or the prosecution action reflects a bad faith attempt to gain a tactical advantage, the court should dismiss the case.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (9)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0