메뉴 건너뛰기

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국형사법학회 형사법연구 형사법연구 제23권 제1호
발행연도
수록면
167 - 208 (42page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
이 논문의 연구방법이 궁금하신가요?
🏆
연구결과
이 논문의 연구결과가 궁금하신가요?
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

Considering differences between the illegality of attempt and completion as well as dictionary definition of a thief, a thief in quasi-robbery means only the completed one except an attempted one. Hence, either the attempt or completion of quasi-robbery depends on whether an assault or a threat reaches the degree which can suppress the insubordination of the counterpart or not. The above-mentioned propositions put forward the following four inferences:Firstly, when a completed thief causes an assault or a threat which reaches the degree that can suppress the insubordination of the counterpart, the thief is responsible for 'completion' of quasi-robbery. Secondly, when a completed thief causes an assault or a threat which doesn't reach the degree that can suppress the insubordination of the counterpart, the thief is responsible for 'attempt' of quasi-robbery. Thirdly, when an attempted thief causes an assault or a threat which reaches the degree that can suppress the insubordination of the counterpart, even if the insubordination of the counterpart is actually suppressed, the thief isn't responsible for attempt or completion of quasi-robbery because an attempted thief isn't the subject of quasi-robbery. Fourthly, when an attempted thief causes an assault or a threat which doesn't reach the degree that can suppress the insubordination of the counterpart, the thief isn't responsible for attempt or completion of quasi-robbery because an attempted thief isn't the subject of quasi-robbery.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지
정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌

참고문헌 신청

최근 본 자료

전체보기