메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국주관성연구학회 Journal of Human Subjectivity Journal of Human Subjectivity 제10권 제1호
발행연도
2012.1
수록면
81 - 102 (22page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Assessment practitioners commonly assert that faculty involvement in the assessment process is critical to its success, though obtaining such involvement is not an easy task. Faculty members have numerous demands of their time, and anecdotal evidence indicates that faculty members often prioritize assessment activities below other activities, if at all. As individual perceptions are often the best predictors of behavior, and beliefs influence perceptions, judgments, and practices, the purpose of this study was to describe the perceptions of faculty at two large, public research universities concerning the ways that institutions of higher education should utilize assessment of student learning outcomes. Participants completed a Q sort with 36 items representing the perceived accountability vs. improvement dichotomy at the course, program, and institutional levels. Additional statements represented negative views toward assessment. Two distinct factors resulted. It’s Not Personal posits that assessment is primarily valuable for program and institutional improvement, with a supplemental awareness of external pressures of accountability. It’s All About My Courses asserts that the primary focus of assessment should be upon individual courses. This later factor, however, was bipolar with some participants possessing an opposing view indicating that assessment efforts are generally a waste of time.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (24)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0