메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국의학교육학회 Korean Journal of Medical Education Korean Journal of Medical Education 제26권 제2호
발행연도
2014.1
수록면
107 - 115 (9page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Purpose: Information gathering ability had been evaluated mainly via checklists in clinical performance examinations (CPX). But,it is not proved yet if students write the information correctly in postencounter note (PN), although they asked questions or performedphysical examinations (PE) about the information when they interacted with standardized patients in CPX. This study addressed thenecessity of introducing PN to evaluate the ability in CPX. Methods: After patient encounters, students were instructed to write the findings of history taking and physical examination thatthey considered as important information in approaching the patient’s problems in PN. PNs were scored using answer keys selectedfrom checklist items, which were considered to be recorded in PN by CPX experts. Results: PNs of six CPX cases from 54 students were analyzed. Correlation coefficients between the key-checklist scores and PNscores of six cases were moderate to high (0.52 to 0.79). However, students frequently neglected some cardinal features of chiefcomplains, pertinent findings of past/social history and PE, and pertinent negative findings of associated symptoms in PNs, whichwere checked as ‘done’ in the keys of checklists. Conclusion: It is necessary to introduce PN in CPX to evaluate the students’ ability of synthesis and integration of patient information.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (17)

참고문헌 신청

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0