인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
이용수
초록· 키워드
With its more than 35 years of experience with EIA of NEPA in United States, the extensiveknowledge base of EIA could be the most suitable place for initial field of HIA to explorelessons available for. However, caution is needed as the technical differences in analysis,different policy context, and distinct professional culture between EIA and HIA might be. Thesuccesse of EIA of NEPA is the integration of environmental goals into decision makingprocess, improved planning, and increased transparency and public involvement, whereasshortcomings of it were defined as the excessive volume and complexity of EIA documents, thelimited and adversarial public involvement, the procedural process (not substantive), focus onprojects (not on policies and programs), and the limited consideration of health impacts.Integrating HIA into existing EIA process is positive in two reasons that the human health isclosely related with natural environment and EIA process is a fully established process thateffectively cuts across bureaucratic and sectoral boundaries. Also, integrating of HIA into EIAmight be a way with least resistance for the widespread use. A freestanding HIA separatedfrom EIA is desirable in terms of excessive volume of EIA documents and the procedural andlegal focus of EIA. It is needed to develop the formulated methodologies for advancing HIAwhether it is a part of or separated from EIA, and to estimate the potential values of HIA in thesubstantial society context. When possible, HIA should be established on the ways that EIAshave been used successfully.
#HIA
#Health Impact Assessment)
#EIA
#Environmental Impact Assessment)
#NEPA
#National Environmental Policy Act)
#EIS
#Environmental Impact Statement)
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
등록된 정보가 없습니다.
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
