인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
피인용 0
초록·키워드
An employee can be guaranteed the minimum wage and labor conditions, and have improvements in social/economic status at the workplace through the three primary labor rights as in the constitution; for this, the details of labor conditions are determined through group negotiations with the employer. In the case an agreement fails to be reached despite the negotiations between the concerned parties, the labor and management parties come to the state of a labor dispute, where the labor union exercises the constitutionally granted right to collective action and the employer executes lock-out, which is a dispute action in labor union law. The basis of this can be found in the Article 2 of Labor Union and Labor Relations Mediation Act; it is defined as “the act performed with the purpose of achieving one’s own claim by a party directly concerned with the labor relation and the counteract which hinders normal operation of business” such that not only the labor union, but also the employer is granted the lockout as a countermeasure.
Lock-out is a dispute activity of the employer of temporarily and collectively denying the receipt of labor in order to avoid wage payment duties based on the existence of a laborer dispute activity. As such, lock-out can go beyond avoiding wage payment duties through denying receipt of labor to the extent of bringing about suspension of the labor union’s exercise of dispute activity right, such that the issue of whether to continue or stop lock-out as an exercise of dispute activity right by the employer even when the labor union has stopped the dispute activity.
This study seeks to examine discussions as to the legitimacy of lock-out such as what is the legal basis for the employer to counteract with lock-out against the laborer dispute activity and the requirements and legal effects of lock-out, and establish the system of a new theory of lock-out.
Lock-out is a dispute activity of the employer of temporarily and collectively denying the receipt of labor in order to avoid wage payment duties based on the existence of a laborer dispute activity. As such, lock-out can go beyond avoiding wage payment duties through denying receipt of labor to the extent of bringing about suspension of the labor union’s exercise of dispute activity right, such that the issue of whether to continue or stop lock-out as an exercise of dispute activity right by the employer even when the labor union has stopped the dispute activity.
This study seeks to examine discussions as to the legitimacy of lock-out such as what is the legal basis for the employer to counteract with lock-out against the laborer dispute activity and the requirements and legal effects of lock-out, and establish the system of a new theory of lock-out.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-360-001214777
