인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 저널정보
- 동양사학회 동양사학연구 東洋史學硏究 第148輯
- 발행연도
- 2019.9
- 수록면
- 377 - 408 (32page)
- DOI
- 10.17856/jahs.2019.9.148.377
이용수
초록· 키워드
After the end of the World War Ⅱ, Mao Zedong raised the ‘intermediate zone theory’ and interpreted the newly formed cold war order in his own way. Mao set up a broad ‘intermediate zone’ between the United States and the Soviet Union, and gave it central status of the world revolution. Since 1948, however, Mao gradually began to accept the Soviet Union"s ‘two camps theory’, and as a result, he declared the ‘lean to one side’ policy in June 1949. In the ‘lean to one side’ policy, the world was divided into two camps led by the United States and the Soviet Union, and there were no more space left for the ‘intermediate zone’. The world views of the ‘intermediate zone theory’ and the ‘lean to one side’ policy line were considered completely separate, and the change in diplomatic line was regarded as a significant shift in the Chinese Communist Party’s foreign policy.
However, on the basis of the ‘intermediate zone theory’ and the ‘lean to one side’ policy line, there was a common ‘people vs. anti-people’ Maoist dichotomous world view. The world was divided into three parts in the ‘intermediate zone theory’, and two parts in the ‘lean to one side’ policy line, but the two could also be divided into two parts, which are ‘people’s anti-imperialist camp’ and ‘anti-people’s imperialist camp’. The ‘intermediate zone theory’ and the ‘lean to one side policy line’ were both sharing Mao’s dichotomous world view, so they were not opposed to each other but rather on a same basis. The reason why Mao was able to bring up the ‘intermediate zone theory’ again in 1954, was because the two foreign policy line shared one common world view.
However, on the basis of the ‘intermediate zone theory’ and the ‘lean to one side’ policy line, there was a common ‘people vs. anti-people’ Maoist dichotomous world view. The world was divided into three parts in the ‘intermediate zone theory’, and two parts in the ‘lean to one side’ policy line, but the two could also be divided into two parts, which are ‘people’s anti-imperialist camp’ and ‘anti-people’s imperialist camp’. The ‘intermediate zone theory’ and the ‘lean to one side policy line’ were both sharing Mao’s dichotomous world view, so they were not opposed to each other but rather on a same basis. The reason why Mao was able to bring up the ‘intermediate zone theory’ again in 1954, was because the two foreign policy line shared one common world view.
#마오쩌둥
#외교 노선
#‘중간지대’
#‘양대진영론’
#‘일변도’ 노선
#毛泽东
#外交路线
#‘中间地带’
#‘两个陈营理论’
#‘一边倒’路线
#Mao Zedong
#foreign policy
#‘intermediate zone’
#‘two camps theory’
#‘lean to one side’ policy
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!
목차
- 머리말
- Ⅰ. ‘중간지대론’의 삼분법과 ‘일변도’ 노선의 이분법
- Ⅱ. ‘인민 對 反인민’의 이분법
- Ⅲ. ‘중간지대론’의 재등장과 그 변화
- 맺음말
- 참고자료
- Abstract
참고문헌
참고문헌 신청최근 본 자료
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2019-910-001240615
