메뉴 건너뛰기

추천
검색

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
한국무역연구원 무역연구 무역연구 제15권 제1호
발행연도
수록면
199 - 215 (17page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
이 논문의 연구방법이 궁금하신가요?
🏆
연구결과
이 논문의 연구결과가 궁금하신가요?
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

A bank guarantee is independent of the underlying contract between the principal and the guarantor or that between the beneficiary and the principal. Specifically, the rights and obligation of the guarantor is not affected by disputes arising from the underlying contract. It is the essence for the guarantor to pay the beneficiary if the demand for payment would be presented in compliance with the requirements of the bank guarantee. Nonetheless, the exception has been recognized internationally. The exception should allow guarantor or counter-guarantor to dishonor the drawings that abuse the independence principle. However, outright or manifest facts of fraud must be established in order to apply the fraud exception. The exception is applied by legal principles, the so-called “fraud rule” or “an abuse of rights”. There are lots of disputes or conflicts in applying such concepts as “illegality,” “bad faith,” or “unconscionability”. Therefore, this study aims to contribute in terms of preventing such institutional abuses like misusing as a dispute resolution method between the parties concerned or dishonoring by non-payment as well as fraudulent acts and to reduce the disputes or conflicts by establishing the legitimate scope and standard in applying the fraud rule through reviewing these procedural issues and problems under bank guarantee transactions. This paper also suggested practical implications and countermeasures for institutional application.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지
정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌

참고문헌 신청

최근 본 자료

전체보기