메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
Background and Objectives To investigate epidemiological features of patients with sialolithiasisand to evaluate the difference in outcomes depending on its location. Subjects and Method We included in the test 472 patients, or 534 cases, who were admittedto the Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital between February 2006 and May 2017with the diagnosis of sialolithiasis. The diagnosis of sialolithiasis was established by CT images;all of the cases were classified by the location of stones (orifice to stone/orifice to hilum:0-0.25, type I; 0.25-0.5, type II; 0.5-0.75, type III; 0.75-1, type IV). Results The average size of stone was 7.2±4.8 mm and the mean patient age was 36.1±17.4years old. According to the method described above, 534 cases were classified into the following:type I consisted of 188 cases (35.2%), type II consisted of 55 cases (10.2%), type III consistedof 92 cases (17.2%) and type IV consisted of 199 (37.2%). When comparing these types,stones in Type I were significantly smaller than other groups. There was a significant differencein the surgical method depending on the location of stones. Different complications suchas swelling, bleeding, tongue discomfort, ranula, recurrence, etc. have been reported and, together,they statistically show meaningful differences in the distribution depending on types. Conclusion The position of stone in Wharton’s duct is important factor that can determinethe method of surgical procedure or postoperative prognosis. We recommend 4 types classificationof sialolithiasis and it can provide more specific diagnosis of disease and facilitate approachfor treatment.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (13)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0