지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 자료유형
- 학술저널
- 저자정보
- 발행연도
- 2019.12
- 수록면
- 35 - 66 (32page)
- DOI
- 10.29323/mchina.2019.12.84.35
이용수
초록· 키워드
오류제보하기
In this article, I examined the method of remembering May 4th Movement in China and traced the structure of researches on May 4th Movement around the major researchers to find out how the research of the May 4th Movement in China was conducted.
As the May 4th Movement research in China showed a pattern that soared every 10 years rather than a gradual increase, it seemed to be closely related to politics, focusing on guiding the collective memory of society. Therefore I tried to examine the structure of the research through the correlation between research papers, I applied the WNET metric analysis program to analyze the papers and to visualize the intellectual structure and its implications. In particular, I selected only the studies of major researchers published in CNKI who are actively doing research as samples for data. As these major researchers were influential among the researcher groups, it was easy to structurally identify the research trends. In addition, I supplemented it with reference studies and compared several data analysis methods to secure objectivity of the study.
As shown in the keyword co-word analysis, the major groups of researchers were divided into four clusters, the largest ones being the mainstream, and the others took critical approaches to the Nationalist Party(Kuomintang), or to criticism of the traditional culture of the May 4th Movement.
Above all, Peng Ming(彭明)’s stance on the May 4th Movement was mainstream. This corresponded directly to the result of keywords analysis. In terms of the number of papers, Xi(jinping, 习近平) was close to Peng, but Peng’s influence, such as his perspective on the new cultural movement was way ahead. Still, it was confirmed that Peng’s characteristic Neo-Democratic Revolutionary interpretation based on historical materialism was being reproduced. From the beginning, researches on the May 4th Movement tended to be commemorative closely linked to politics. In addition, many magazines through which researches were mainly communicated had party-related origin. Thus it was inevitable that the Neo-Democratic revolutionary discourse had significant impact on contemporary researchers.
Ouyang Zhesheng(欧阳哲生), though was sorted to the same cluster with Peng, paid his attention to historiography on the May 4th Movement and made its reliance to politics noteworthy. His study seemed to be closely related to that of Zhou Cezong(周策纵) in the united States and provided a steppingstone from ideological-based researches to the ones on actual background and causes of the May 4th Movement.
As the May 4th Movement research in China showed a pattern that soared every 10 years rather than a gradual increase, it seemed to be closely related to politics, focusing on guiding the collective memory of society. Therefore I tried to examine the structure of the research through the correlation between research papers, I applied the WNET metric analysis program to analyze the papers and to visualize the intellectual structure and its implications. In particular, I selected only the studies of major researchers published in CNKI who are actively doing research as samples for data. As these major researchers were influential among the researcher groups, it was easy to structurally identify the research trends. In addition, I supplemented it with reference studies and compared several data analysis methods to secure objectivity of the study.
As shown in the keyword co-word analysis, the major groups of researchers were divided into four clusters, the largest ones being the mainstream, and the others took critical approaches to the Nationalist Party(Kuomintang), or to criticism of the traditional culture of the May 4th Movement.
Above all, Peng Ming(彭明)’s stance on the May 4th Movement was mainstream. This corresponded directly to the result of keywords analysis. In terms of the number of papers, Xi(jinping, 习近平) was close to Peng, but Peng’s influence, such as his perspective on the new cultural movement was way ahead. Still, it was confirmed that Peng’s characteristic Neo-Democratic Revolutionary interpretation based on historical materialism was being reproduced. From the beginning, researches on the May 4th Movement tended to be commemorative closely linked to politics. In addition, many magazines through which researches were mainly communicated had party-related origin. Thus it was inevitable that the Neo-Democratic revolutionary discourse had significant impact on contemporary researchers.
Ouyang Zhesheng(欧阳哲生), though was sorted to the same cluster with Peng, paid his attention to historiography on the May 4th Movement and made its reliance to politics noteworthy. His study seemed to be closely related to that of Zhou Cezong(周策纵) in the united States and provided a steppingstone from ideological-based researches to the ones on actual background and causes of the May 4th Movement.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 중국 5·4운동 연구의 역사적 검토
Ⅲ. 5·4운동 연구의 지적 구조와 네트워크
Ⅳ. 중국의 5·4운동 연구의 함의
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
참고문헌 (55)
참고문헌 신청
함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문
논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!
-
日本語単語アクセントの傾向分析 : 日本語能力試験N5レベルを中心に
일어일문학
2017 .02
-
2015年中国新媒体研究新动向
중국지식네트워크
2016 .05
-
元明??期多功能?“?”?究
중국언어연구
2021 .01
-
조선어교육에서의 상호작용분석에 관한 연구동향 고찰
중국조선어문
2023 .07
-
一九의 『東海道中膝栗毛』에 보이는 가능동사에 관한 일고찰 : 三馬의 滑稽本과 비교를 중심으로
일본문화학보
2015 .08
-
중한 속격구조의 통사 및 의미특성 고찰 — 중한 속격표지 ‘的’, ‘-의’, ‘-적(인)’ 의 비교 분석을 중심으로
중국문학연구
2018 .01
-
日韓複合動詞組み合せ特徴の対照分析 -後項動詞「つける・붙이다」を中心に-
일어일문학
2020 .08
-
「一生懸命に」 · 「熱心に」の違いについて -『現代日本語書き言葉均衡コーパス』を用いて-
일본문화학보
2019 .11
-
複合動詞「～つく」に関する考察 : 後項動詞「つく」と結合する前項動詞の傾向を中心
대한일어일문학회 학술대회 발표논문 요지집
2018 .04
-
현대 중국어 전치사 ‘向’에 나타난 한국인 학습자의 오류분석 - ‘向’과 ‘对’, ‘给’의 대치 오류를 중심으로
중국어교육과연구
2024 .11
-
试论连词“而”的出现
언어과학연구
2017 .06
-
김일엽, 회향(廻向)과 불교적 실천으로서의 글쓰기
비평문학
2023 .12
-
편집자의 각도에서 본 조선어번역도서에 나타나는 오역현상
중국조선어문
2023 .11
-
《조선말속담대사전》의 편집과 교정 과정에 나타난 조선말 맞춤법 오유 분석
중국조선어문
2020 .01
-
≪博雅??≫中??式?合?的??分析
중국언어연구
2021 .01
-
일본어융복합 전공 대학생의 전공선택동기, 진로결정수준, 전공만족도 간의 관계 연구
일본어문학
2015 .01
-
‘-었-’과 ‘了₁’의 시상의미 대응양상 분석
중국조선어문
2021 .05
-
포스트코로나시대 중국 대학 조선어교과의 실시간 원격수업 사례 분석 —위챗과 텐센트 활용을 중심으로
중국조선어문
2022 .01
-
조선문도서편집에서의 사례분석
중국조선어문
2023 .01
-
어간과 토 적기에서의 조선어표기 오유분석
중국조선어문
2023 .05
이 논문의 저자 정보
이 논문과 함께 이용한 논문
즐거운 모반자 : 아스트리드 린드그렌
비비 에드스트룀
,
신수진
창비어린이
2005
.03
동아시아 역사 속의 5 · 4운동 - 反帝運動으로서의 5 · 4운동 연구의 검토와 제언 -
裴京漢
중국근현대사연구
2019
.09
중국 개혁의 성과와 과제: 중국적 특색의 새로운 길은 만들어지고 있는가 : 이현정 외 지음, 『개혁 중국: 변화와 지속』(한울, 2019)을 읽고
장정아
아시아리뷰
2020
.12
淸末民國時期 ‘朝鮮亡國史’의 출판, 유통 및 사회적 반향
徐丹
,
李春圓
중국근현대사연구
2020
.06
중화민국 민법의 제정과 전통 ‘家産制’의 변화
孫承希
동양사학연구
2020
.06
최근 본 자료
댓글(0)
0