메뉴 건너뛰기
소속 기관 / 학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색
질문

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
(사이버한국외국어대학교)
저널정보
한국언어학회 언어 언어 제44권 제4호
발행연도
수록면
871 - 899 (29page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
이 논문의 연구방법이 궁금하신가요?
🏆
연구결과
이 논문의 연구결과가 궁금하신가요?
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색
질문

초록· 키워드

This study investigated the acquisition of tense-dependency by heritage speakers and non-heritage learners of Korean focusing on the effects of their different language backgrounds. Korean is different from English in terms of Sequence of Tense (SOT)1 in that present tense is used in the subordinate clause when the main clause is past tense (i.e., non-SOT language) in order to mark the simultaneity of the two events, whereas past tense is used in English (i.e. SOT language). The difference between the two languages seems to cause frequently observed errors of using past tense in subordinate clauses (e.g., *ecey meli-ka apha-ess-ese yak-ul meke-ess-eyo.‘Since I had a headache yesterday, I took a medicine’) in English learners of Korean. This study examined how the different status of SOT between the two languages influences the acquisition of Korean tense marking by heritage speakers and non-heritage learners of Korean. The results of a grammaticality judgment task on congruent and incongruent conditions in terms of L1-L2 SOT congruency revealed that non-heritage learners showed very different behavioral patterns from heritage speakers and native speakers of Korean, whereas the latter two groups were similar to each other: non-heritage learners showed significantly lower accuracy in their judgment on the ungrammatical non-SOT type sentences in particular, accepting ungrammatical past tense verb in the subordinate clauses as in the example above. The results indicate a negative transfer effect of the native language in non-heritage learners as well as the advantage of early exposure to the language in L2 acquisition of tense-dependency in heritage speakers. More importantly, based on the findings of different patterns between the two learner groups, it is proposed that the developmental trajectories of heritage speakers and non-heritage learners are qualitatively different from each other.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지
정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!

목차

  1. 1. 서론
  2. 2. 이론적 배경
  3. 3. 연구 방법
  4. 4. 연구 결과
  5. 5. 토의
  6. 6. 결론
  7. 참고문헌

참고문헌

참고문헌 신청

최근 본 자료

전체보기