인문학
사회과학
자연과학
공학
의약학
농수해양학
예술체육학
복합학
DBpia AI
AI 에이전트
AI 아이디어
AI 리더
AI 뷰어
Citeasy
크롬 서지관리 다운로드
개인구독
소속 기관이 없으신 경우, 개인 정기구독을 하시면 저렴하게
논문을 무제한 열람 이용할 수 있어요.
지원사업
학술연구/단체지원/교육 등 연구자 활동을 지속하도록 DBpia가 지원하고 있어요.
커뮤니티
연구자들이 자신의 연구와 전문성을 널리 알리고, 새로운 협력의 기회를 만들 수 있는 네트워킹 공간이에요.
논문 기본 정보
- 저자정보
피인용 0
초록·키워드
The purpose of this paper was to systematically review the contemporary literature on coach development programs (CDPs). Three questions guided this review: (a) What types of CDPs have been studied? (b) What research methods have been used to study CDPs? (c) What types of program evaluation assessment questions have researchers used to investigate CDPs? Using electronic databases, articles (𝑛 = 56) were identified. The inclusion criteria required articles to be printed in English, peer-reviewed, databased, published between 2015 and 2019, and examine one CDP. The findings indicate that majority of CDPs studied during this time period were delivered in-person to a collective group of coaches by a national governing body. Furthermore, CDPs were most commonly delivered to coaches in less than a day and tend to target coaches working in multiple sports and various contexts (children/adolescents, participation/performance). Sixty-three percent of the articles in this review used a qualitative approach, twenty-one percent used a mixed-method approach, and sixteen percent used a quantitative approach. Semi-structured interviews of coaches were the most popular data collection technique. Process assessment evaluation questions were asked the most by researchers, followed by outcome and program design questions.
본문·목차
인공지능 문자 인식 모델을 통해 추출된 텍스트로, 일부 오타나 오류가 포함될 수 있으나 지속적으로 개선 중입니다.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
오류를 발견하셨다면 해당 부분을 드래그한 후 ' 를 통해 신고해주세요.
최근 본 자료 전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-692-000376978
