메뉴 건너뛰기
소속 기관 / 학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
고객센터 ENG
주제분류

논문 기본 정보

자료유형
학술저널
저자정보
저널정보
The Academy of Korean Studies THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES THE REVIEW OF KOREAN STUDIES Vol.7 No.4 DECEMBER 2004
발행연도
수록면
205 - 227 (23page)

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
이 논문의 연구방법이 궁금하신가요?
🏆
연구결과
이 논문의 연구결과가 궁금하신가요?

초록· 키워드

This article explores King Jeongjo’s role in coping with the religious conflicts among the intellectuals in eighteenth-century Joseon. My argument is that King Jeongjo’s ruling style led Catholicism debates into political persecutions. He has been regarded, in most existing works, as generous and tolerable to Catholicism. In those works, King Jeongjo was on the defense line against Anti-Catholicism attacks during his reign, but after his sudden death, Pyokpa, the political rivals of the Namin, took retaliatory action in the name of ‘Western Learning.
Of course, King Jeongjo had a great interest in “Western Learning” and protected some scholars of the Namin against political attacks. But he took measures that created distrust among his subjects in order to weaken their power. He often followed the tactic of “divide and rule,” so called “like cures like.” In the mean time, the relationship among his subjects grew worse. The leaders of the Noron, for example, said to those of the Namin in the public places, “I will not live with you under the sky.” The Namin, to make things worse, were unexpectedly divided into two groups; pro-Catholicism and anti-Catholicism. The distrust and attacks among the Namin scholars made them irreconcilable, and such became one cause of the martyrdoms of 1801. In sum, King Jeongjo was responsible for the immense political persecution, although it was the unintended results of his actions after his death.
상세정보 수정요청해당 페이지 내 제목·저자·목차·페이지
정보가 잘못된 경우 알려주세요!

목차

  1. Introduction
  2. Political Situation and Debates on Catholicism in the Second Half of the Seventeenth Century
  3. “Politician” King Jeongjo’s Reaction to the Catholic Incidents in 1791 and 1792
  4. Conclusion: Unhappy Encounter of Western-Eastern Learning and King Jeongjo’s Responsibility
  5. References

참고문헌

참고문헌 신청

최근 본 자료

전체보기
UCI(KEPA) : I410-ECN-0101-2020-911-000954994