메뉴 건너뛰기
.. 내서재 .. 알림
소속 기관/학교 인증
인증하면 논문, 학술자료 등을  무료로 열람할 수 있어요.
한국대학교, 누리자동차, 시립도서관 등 나의 기관을 확인해보세요
(국내 대학 90% 이상 구독 중)
로그인 회원가입 고객센터 ENG
주제분류

추천
검색

이용수

표지
📌
연구주제
📖
연구배경
🔬
연구방법
🏆
연구결과
AI에게 요청하기
추천
검색

초록· 키워드

오류제보하기
ObjectiveCesarean section is the most commonly performed obstetrical surgical procedure; however, there are no standardguidelines on appropriate skin closure techniques and materials. Only few comparative studies have been conductedon different skin closure techniques, and they have shown conflicting results. Therefore, we compared differentskin closure techniques during emergency cesarean section to identify the best technique with minimal woundcomplication rates. MethodsPatients were randomized into 3 groups (group A, n=100; group B, n=102; and group C, n=98). In group A, theskin was closed using staples; in group B, via the subcuticular technique using monocryl 3-0; and in group C, usingmattress suture nylon (2-0). The primary outcome was a composite of wound complications, including infection,seroma, gaping, and need for resuturing and antibiotic administration. The secondary outcome included closure time,pain perception, patient satisfaction, and cost. Analyses were performed in accordance with the intention-to-treatprinciple. ResultsThe composite wound complication rate in the entire cohort was 16.6% (n=50); the complication rate was significantlyhigher in group A than in the other groups. Infection was the most common wound complication observed in theentire study group (86%) and was significantly higher in group A than in groups B and C (P≤0.001). ConclusionThe use of staples for cesarean section skin closure is associated with an increased risk of wound complications andprolonged hospital stay postoperative visits.

목차

등록된 정보가 없습니다.

참고문헌 (25)

참고문헌 신청

함께 읽어보면 좋을 논문

논문 유사도에 따라 DBpia 가 추천하는 논문입니다. 함께 보면 좋을 연관 논문을 확인해보세요!

이 논문의 저자 정보

최근 본 자료

전체보기

댓글(0)

0